torspec - Tor's protocol specification documents and proposals

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2023-10-12	Wrap text proposals in backticks.	Nick Mathewson

2021-11-22	Fold 314 (markdown) into 001 (process).	Nick Mathewson

2017-12-08	Update the list of current torspec editors.	Isis Lovecruft

2017-12-08	Require a "Ticket:" field for future proposals in certain states.	Isis Lovecruft
	New proposals in states {OPEN,ACCEPTED,CLOSED,FINISHED} must have a "Ticket:" field which may either be a ticket number or a publicly accessible URL. When the ticket is just a number, it should be in reference to Tor's canonical bug tracker. This information greatly helps both new contributors and relay operators who are interested in the implementation status of a working proposal. This patch permits the "Ticket:" field to be added to older proposals (<= prop#288), but it does not require it.
2016-12-02	Keep proposals/proposal-status.txt up to date.	George Kadianakis

2015-09-17	Sebastian isn't a proposal editor	Sebastian Hahn
	Also let's get our pronouns correct
2015-09-16	Update 001-process with new status codes, and list of editors	Nick Mathewson
	To be conservative, I'm saying that the proposal editors are everybody with commit rights, except for Roger, who is way too busy :)
2015-04-03	update the proposal process with the new (circa 2011) name for tor-dev	Roger Dingledine

2010-12-07	Merge branch 'isolated-streams'	Nick Mathewson
	Conflicts: doc/spec/proposals/000-index.txt
2010-08-30	This change creates proposal 171: 171-separate-streams-by-port-or-host.txt	Jacob Appelbaum
	This numbers the proposal to reflect the current discussion on or-dev and irc This change updates the proposal index to reflect prop 171 This change also includes an update about Nick blessing me as a proposal editor Proposal 171 is the product of many comments from many contributors including but not limited to: Damon McCoy Linus Nordberg Nick Matthewson Robert Hogan Robert Ransom Sebastian Hahn
2010-08-03	Clarify that implementation is for discussion of implementation	Nick Mathewson

2009-05-05	Fix typo in 001-process.txt	Sebastian Hahn

2009-05-05	Remove all svn metadata minus what I missed.	Sebastian Hahn
	Tor doesn't use SVN anymore, making $Revision$, $Id$ and $Date$ meaningless. Remove them without replacement.
2009-05-05	SVN-specific metadata should no longer be part of a proposal	Sebastian Hahn
	Update the proposal creation instructions to remove the Version and Last-Modified fields.
2008-07-14	For some open and accepted proposals, note their target versions.	Nick Mathewson
	svn:r15904
2008-03-11	r18722@catbus: nickm \| 2008-03-10 14:59:56 -0400	Nick Mathewson
	Try to clarify draft vs needs-revision. svn:r13956
2007-06-16	unified svn properties and keywords for proposals and address spec	Karsten Loesing
	svn:r10625
2007-03-02	r12373@Kushana: nickm \| 2007-03-02 13:11:11 -0500	Nick Mathewson
	credit PEP as source of Tor process svn:r9712
2007-02-25	more cleanup	Roger Dingledine
	svn:r9650
2007-02-20	r12276@Kushana: nickm \| 2007-02-20 18:16:48 -0500	Nick Mathewson
	Clarify some aspects of proposal process, based on questions from phobos. svn:r9606
2007-02-19	r10073@totoro: nickm \| 2007-02-19 09:53:42 -0500	Nick Mathewson
	proposal procedure clarifications from peter palfrader. svn:r9602
2007-02-10	some proposal fixes, mostly cosmetic	Roger Dingledine
	svn:r9551
2007-02-10	r12202@Kushana: nickm \| 2007-02-09 12:05:53 -0500	Nick Mathewson
	Mark 100 dead; write more about what should go in a proposal; add status tags to index. svn:r9543
2007-01-30	r11597@catbus: nickm \| 2007-01-30 02:49:52 -0500	Nick Mathewson
	Add a description of our new change process. Assign statuses to existing proposals. svn:r9461