aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/proposals/001-process.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>2015-09-16 16:28:14 -0400
committerNick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>2015-09-16 16:28:14 -0400
commite5016e275baf23fdc7c93d63253833c75a3eda03 (patch)
tree475dd28653469617a1ed9ff2957af58a7f301a84 /proposals/001-process.txt
parent97baa25573ff7868d240e789d06f940d74c849f3 (diff)
downloadtorspec-e5016e275baf23fdc7c93d63253833c75a3eda03.tar.gz
torspec-e5016e275baf23fdc7c93d63253833c75a3eda03.zip
Update 001-process with new status codes, and list of editors
To be conservative, I'm saying that the proposal editors are everybody with commit rights, except for Roger, who is way too busy :)
Diffstat (limited to 'proposals/001-process.txt')
-rw-r--r--proposals/001-process.txt15
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/proposals/001-process.txt b/proposals/001-process.txt
index ed36a95..e94e5e2 100644
--- a/proposals/001-process.txt
+++ b/proposals/001-process.txt
@@ -70,12 +70,14 @@ How new proposals get added:
Once an idea has been proposed on the development list, a properly formatted
(see below) draft exists, and rough consensus within the active development
- community exists that this idea warrants consideration, the proposal editor
+ community exists that this idea warrants consideration, the proposal editors
will officially add the proposal.
To get your proposal in, send it to the tor-dev mailing list.
- The current proposal editors are Nick Mathewson and Jacob Appelbaum.
+ The current proposal editors are Nick Mathewson, Jacob Appelbaum, George
+ Kadianakis, Sebastian Hahn, Damian Johnson, Isis Lovecruft, and David
+ Goulet.
What should go in a proposal:
@@ -174,8 +176,15 @@ Proposal status:
Meta: This is not a proposal, but a document about proposals.
+ Reserve: This proposal is not something we're currently planning to
+ implement, but we might want to resurrect it some day if we decide to
+ do something like what it proposes.
- The editor maintains the correct status of proposals, based on rough
+ Informational: This proposal is the last word on what it's doing.
+ It isn't going to turn into a spec unless somebody copy-and-pastes
+ it into a new spec for a new subsystem.
+
+ The editors maintain the correct status of proposals, based on rough
consensus and his own discretion.
Proposal numbering: