aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/proposals/001-process.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>2007-02-20 23:22:33 +0000
committerNick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>2007-02-20 23:22:33 +0000
commit3e827b0b522afd010ce5890d9a7aed94e0e9fc74 (patch)
treea1d6fbf9516ce565b8cb0ed0d9e1385879b0dbb9 /proposals/001-process.txt
parent321a4715ca816ef1ffce20ce3a51774957aa2fac (diff)
downloadtorspec-3e827b0b522afd010ce5890d9a7aed94e0e9fc74.tar.gz
torspec-3e827b0b522afd010ce5890d9a7aed94e0e9fc74.zip
r12276@Kushana: nickm | 2007-02-20 18:16:48 -0500
Clarify some aspects of proposal process, based on questions from phobos. svn:r9606
Diffstat (limited to 'proposals/001-process.txt')
-rw-r--r--proposals/001-process.txt28
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/proposals/001-process.txt b/proposals/001-process.txt
index e86bd7c..6cad912 100644
--- a/proposals/001-process.txt
+++ b/proposals/001-process.txt
@@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ How to change the specs now:
Once it's fleshed out enough, it becomes a proposal.
Like an RFC, every proposal gets a number. Unlike RFCs, proposals can
- change over time and keep the same number. The history for each proposal
+ change over time and keep the same number, until they are finally
+ accepted or rejected. The history for each proposal
will be stored in the Tor Subversion repository.
Once a proposal is in the repository, we should discuss and improve it
@@ -55,7 +56,8 @@ How to change the specs now:
remain the canonical documentation for the Tor protocol: no proposal is
ever the canonical documentation for an implemented feature.
- {It's still okay to make small changes to the spec if the code can be
+ {It's still okay to make small changes directly to the spec if the code
+ can be
written more or less immediately, or cosmetic changes if no code change is
required. This document reflects the current developers' _intent_, not
a permanent promise to always use this process in the future: we reserve
@@ -66,8 +68,12 @@ How new proposals get added:
Once an idea has been proposed on the development list, a properly formatted
(see below) draft exists, and rough consensus withing the active development
- community exists that this idea warrants consideration the proposal editor
- will official add the proposal.
+ community exists that this idea warrants consideration, the proposal editor
+ will officially add the proposal.
+
+ To get your proposal in, send it to or-dev.
+
+ The current proposal editor is Nick Mathewson.
What should go in a proposal:
@@ -82,7 +88,7 @@ What should go in a proposal:
After the Overview, the proposal becomes more free-form. Depending on its
the length and complexity, the proposal can break into sections as
appropriate, or follow a short discursive format. Every proposal should
- contain at least the following information before it can be "ACCEPTED",
+ contain at least the following information before it is "ACCEPTED",
though the information does not need to be in sections with these names.
Motivation: What problem is the proposal trying to solve? Why does
@@ -127,15 +133,21 @@ Proposal status:
Open: A proposal under discussion.
Accepted: The proposal is complete, and we intend to implement it.
+ After this point, substantive changes to the proposal should be
+ avoided, and regarded as a sign of the process having failed
+ somewhere.
- Finished: The proposal has been accepted and implemented.
+ Finished: The proposal has been accepted and implemented. After this
+ point, the proposal should not be changed.
Closed: The proposal has been accepted, implemented, and merged into the
- main specification documents.
+ main specification documents. The proposal should not be changed after
+ this point.
Rejected: We're not going to implement the feature as described here,
though we might do some other version. See comments in the document
- for details.
+ for details. The proposal should not be changed after this point;
+ to bring up some other version of the idea, write a new proposal.
Needs-Revision: The idea for the proposal is a good one, but the proposal
as it stands has serious problems that keep it from being accepted.