diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | proposals/219-expanded-dns.txt | 9 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/proposals/219-expanded-dns.txt b/proposals/219-expanded-dns.txt index 07bd38d..b43e63e 100644 --- a/proposals/219-expanded-dns.txt +++ b/proposals/219-expanded-dns.txt @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ Status: Draft cells, with contents: [00 04 00] R2[0:495], [00] R2[495:992], and [01] R2[992:1024] respectively. - The server should + The server should {XXXXX}. [NOTE: I'm using the length field and the is-this-the-last-cell field to allow multi-packet responses in the future. -NM] @@ -136,6 +136,13 @@ Status: Draft code from OR. [XXXX Must they also refuse to report addresses that resolve to these? -NM] + [XXX I don't think so. People often use public DNS + records that map to private adresses. We can't effectively separate + "truly public" records from the ones client's dnsmasq or similar DNS + resolver returns. - OM] + + [XXX Then do you mean "must be returned as the DNS error from the OP"?] + Request for special names (.onion, .exit, .noconnect) must never be sent, and will return REFUSED. |