1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
|
1. Overview
We should rate limit the volume of stream creations at exits:
2.1. Per-circuit limits
If a given circuit opens more than N streams in X seconds, further
stream requests over the next Y seconds should fail with the reason
'resourcelimit'. Clients will automatically notice this and switch to
a new circuit.
The goal is to limit the effects of port scans on a given exit relay,
so the relay's ISP won't get hassled as much.
First thoughts for parameters would be N=100 streams in X=5 seconds
causes 30 seconds of fails; and N=300 streams in X=30 seconds causes
30 seconds of fails.
We could simplify by, instead of having a "for 30 seconds" parameter,
just marking the circuit as forever failing new requests. (We don't want
to just close the circuit because it may still have open streams on it.)
2.2. Per-destination limits
If a given circuit opens more than N1 streams in X seconds to a single
IP address, or all the circuits combined open more than N2 streams,
then we should fail further attempts to reach that address for a while.
The goal is to limit the abuse that Tor exit relays can dish out
to a single target either for socket DoS or for web crawling, in
the hopes of a) not triggering their automated defenses, and b) not
making them upset at Tor. Hopefully these self-imposed bans will be
much shorter-lived than bans or barriers put up by the websites.
3. Issues
3.1. Circuit-creation overload
Making clients move to new circuits more often will cause more circuit
creation requests.
3.2. How to pick the parameters?
If we pick the numbers too low, then popular sites are effectively
cut out of Tor. If we pick them too high, we don't do much good.
Worse, picking them wrong isn't easy to fix, since the deployed Tor
servers will ship with a certain set of numbers.
We could put numbers (or "general settings") in the networkstatus
consensus, and Tor exits would adapt more dynamically.
We could also have a local config option about how aggressive this
server should be with its parameters.
4. Client-side limitations
Perhaps the clients should have built-in rate limits too, so they avoid
harrassing the servers by default?
Tricky if we want to get Tor clients in use at large enclaves.
|
