aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/proposals/ideas/xxx-crypto-requirements.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>2010-12-14 23:31:42 -0500
committerNick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>2010-12-14 23:31:42 -0500
commit74c3b7b68548b6fc995bfff52f718a879b7884b6 (patch)
tree43e132c792117154ce12c46c1579049151d77123 /proposals/ideas/xxx-crypto-requirements.txt
parent6c19a242d69e078dce81941a395314d8d9f48429 (diff)
downloadtorspec-74c3b7b68548b6fc995bfff52f718a879b7884b6.tar.gz
torspec-74c3b7b68548b6fc995bfff52f718a879b7884b6.zip
Reformat circuit crypto requirements as a proposal-like document
Diffstat (limited to 'proposals/ideas/xxx-crypto-requirements.txt')
-rw-r--r--proposals/ideas/xxx-crypto-requirements.txt155
1 files changed, 72 insertions, 83 deletions
diff --git a/proposals/ideas/xxx-crypto-requirements.txt b/proposals/ideas/xxx-crypto-requirements.txt
index 6e03523..8a8943a 100644
--- a/proposals/ideas/xxx-crypto-requirements.txt
+++ b/proposals/ideas/xxx-crypto-requirements.txt
@@ -1,83 +1,72 @@
-
-This draft is intended to specify the meaning of ‘secure’ for a Tor
-circuit protocol, hopefully in enough detail that
-mathematically-inclined cryptographers can use this definition to
-prove that a Tor circuit protocol (or component thereof) is secure
-under reasonably well-accepted assumptions.
-
-Tor's current circuit protocol consists of the CREATE, CREATED, RELAY,
-DESTROY, CREATE_FAST, CREATED_FAST, and RELAY_EARLY cells (including
-all subtypes of RELAY and RELAY_EARLY cells). Tor currently has two
-circuit-extension handshake protocols: one consists of the CREATE and
-CREATED cells; the other, used only over the TLS connection to the
-first node in a circuit, consists of the CREATE_FAST and CREATED_FAST
-cells.
-
-
-
-1. Every circuit-extension handshake protocol must provide forward
-secrecy -- the protocol must allow both the client and the relay to
-destroy, immediately after a circuit is closed, enough key material
-that no attacker who can eavesdrop on all handshake and circuit cells
-and who can seize and inspect the client and relay after the circuit
-is closed will be able to decrypt any non-handshake data sent along
-the circuit.
-
-In particular, the protocol must not require that a key which can be
-used to decrypt non-handshake data be stored for a predetermined
-period of time, as such a key must be written to persistent storage.
-
-
-
-2. Every circuit-extension handshake protocol must specify what key
-material must be used only once in order to allow unlinkability of
-circuit-extension handshakes.
-
-
-
-3. Every circuit-extension handshake protocol must authenticate the relay
-to the client -- an attacker who can eavesdrop on all handshake and
-circuit cells and who can participate in handshakes with the client
-must not be able to determine a symmetric session key that a circuit
-will use without either knowing a secret key corresponding to a
-handshake-authentication public key published by the relay or breaking
-a cryptosystem for which the relay published a
-handshake-authentication public key.
-
-
-
-4. Every circuit-extension handshake protocol must ensure that neither
-the client nor the relay can cause the handshake to result in a
-predetermined symmetric session key.
-
-
-
-5. Every circuit-extension handshake protocol should ensure that an
-attacker who can predict the relay's ephemeral secret input to the
-handshake and can eavesdrop on all handshake and circuit cells, but
-does not know a secret key corresponding to the
-handshake-authentication public key used in the handshake, cannot
-break the handshake-authentication public key's cryptosystem, and
-cannot predict the client's ephemeral secret input to the handshake,
-cannot predict the symmetric session keys used for the resulting
-circuit.
-
-
-
-6. The circuit protocol must specify an end-to-end flow-control
-mechanism, and must allow for the addition of new mechanisms.
-
-
-
-7. The circuit protocol should specify the statistics to be exchanged
-between circuit endpoints in order to support end-to-end flow control,
-and should specify how such statistics can be verified.
-
-
-
-8. The circuit protocol should allow an endpoint to verify that the other
-endpoint is participating in an end-to-end flow-control protocol
-honestly.
-
-
-
+Title: Requirements for Tor's circuit cryptography
+Author: Robert Ransom
+Created: 12 December 2010
+
+Overview
+
+ This draft is intended to specify the meaning of 'secure' for a Tor
+ circuit protocol, hopefully in enough detail that
+ mathematically-inclined cryptographers can use this definition to
+ prove that a Tor circuit protocol (or component thereof) is secure
+ under reasonably well-accepted assumptions.
+
+ Tor's current circuit protocol consists of the CREATE, CREATED, RELAY,
+ DESTROY, CREATE_FAST, CREATED_FAST, and RELAY_EARLY cells (including
+ all subtypes of RELAY and RELAY_EARLY cells). Tor currently has two
+ circuit-extension handshake protocols: one consists of the CREATE and
+ CREATED cells; the other, used only over the TLS connection to the
+ first node in a circuit, consists of the CREATE_FAST and CREATED_FAST
+ cells.
+
+Requirements
+
+ 1. Every circuit-extension handshake protocol must provide forward
+ secrecy -- the protocol must allow both the client and the relay to
+ destroy, immediately after a circuit is closed, enough key material
+ that no attacker who can eavesdrop on all handshake and circuit cells
+ and who can seize and inspect the client and relay after the circuit
+ is closed will be able to decrypt any non-handshake data sent along
+ the circuit.
+
+ In particular, the protocol must not require that a key which can be
+ used to decrypt non-handshake data be stored for a predetermined
+ period of time, as such a key must be written to persistent storage.
+
+ 2. Every circuit-extension handshake protocol must specify what key
+ material must be used only once in order to allow unlinkability of
+ circuit-extension handshakes.
+
+ 3. Every circuit-extension handshake protocol must authenticate the relay
+ to the client -- an attacker who can eavesdrop on all handshake and
+ circuit cells and who can participate in handshakes with the client
+ must not be able to determine a symmetric session key that a circuit
+ will use without either knowing a secret key corresponding to a
+ handshake-authentication public key published by the relay or breaking
+ a cryptosystem for which the relay published a
+ handshake-authentication public key.
+
+ 4. Every circuit-extension handshake protocol must ensure that neither
+ the client nor the relay can cause the handshake to result in a
+ predetermined symmetric session key.
+
+ 5. Every circuit-extension handshake protocol should ensure that an
+ attacker who can predict the relay's ephemeral secret input to the
+ handshake and can eavesdrop on all handshake and circuit cells, but
+ does not know a secret key corresponding to the
+ handshake-authentication public key used in the handshake, cannot
+ break the handshake-authentication public key's cryptosystem, and
+ cannot predict the client's ephemeral secret input to the handshake,
+ cannot predict the symmetric session keys used for the resulting
+ circuit.
+
+ 6. The circuit protocol must specify an end-to-end flow-control
+ mechanism, and must allow for the addition of new mechanisms.
+
+ 7. The circuit protocol should specify the statistics to be exchanged
+ between circuit endpoints in order to support end-to-end flow control,
+ and should specify how such statistics can be verified.
+
+
+ 8. The circuit protocol should allow an endpoint to verify that the other
+ endpoint is participating in an end-to-end flow-control protocol
+ honestly.