aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/spec/srv-spec/discussion.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'spec/srv-spec/discussion.md')
-rw-r--r--spec/srv-spec/discussion.md6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/spec/srv-spec/discussion.md b/spec/srv-spec/discussion.md
index ea38318..59d26df 100644
--- a/spec/srv-spec/discussion.md
+++ b/spec/srv-spec/discussion.md
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
<a id="srv-spec.txt-6.1"></a>
-## Why the added complexity from proposal 225?
+## Why the added complexity from proposal 225? {#why-complexity}
The complexity difference between this proposal and prop225 is in part
because prop225 doesn't specify how the shared random value gets to the
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ random values can always be readily accessible to clients.
<a id="srv-spec.txt-6.2"></a>
-## Why do you do a commit-and-reveal protocol in 24 rounds?
+## Why do you do a commit-and-reveal protocol in 24 rounds? {#why-rounds}
The reader might be wondering why we span the protocol over the course of a
whole day (24 hours), when only 3 rounds would be sufficient to generate a
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ recover and rejoin the protocol.
<a id="srv-spec.txt-6.3"></a>
-## Why can't we recover if the 00:00UTC consensus fails?
+## Why can't we recover if the 00:00UTC consensus fails? {#why-no-recovery}
If the 00:00UTC consensus fails, there will be no shared random value for
the whole day. In theory, we could recover by calculating the shared