| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Affected entries are: EntryNodes, ExcludeNodes, ExcludeExitNodes,
ExitNodes, MiddleNodes, HSLayer2Nodes and HSLayer3Nodes.
|
|
|
|
Tor does not follow redirects when bootstraping so we encountered an
error.
Fixes #40053
|
|
|
|
Also, explain why it's relevant for bootstrapping.
This is a comments-only patch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This patch adds support for exposing the environment variables
`TOR_PT_OUTBOUND_BIND_ADDRESS_V4` and `TOR_PT_OUTBOUND_BIND_ADDRESS_V6` to
Pluggable Transport proccesses. These two values will contain the IPv4
and IPv6 address that the user have specified in torrc that they wish
the PT to use for all outgoing IP packets.
It is important to note here that it is up to the indvidual Pluggable
Transport if they are willing to honor these values or ignore them
completely.
One can test this feature using the following dummy PT written in POSIX
shell script:
#!/bin/sh
echo "LOG SEVERITY=warning MESSAGE=\"Value for IPv4: ${TOR_PT_OUTBOUND_BIND_ADDRESS_V4}\""
echo "LOG SEVERITY=warning MESSAGE=\"Value for IPv6: ${TOR_PT_OUTBOUND_BIND_ADDRESS_V6}\""
while true ; do
sleep 1
done
with the following entries in your torrc:
OutboundBindAddressPT 203.0.113.4
OutboundBindAddress 203.0.113.5
OutboundBindAddressPT 2001:db8::4
OutboundBindAddress 2001:db8::5
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/5304
|
|
no actual changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[This is a squashed patch for ticket 7193, based on taking a "git
diff" for the original branch, then applying it with "git apply
-3". I earlier attempted to squash the branch with "git rebase",
but there were too many conflicts. --nickm]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #40135
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
The option `--enable-all-bugs-are-fatal` when used with
`--disable-module-relay` caused GCC to warn about functions that
it thought should be labeled noreturn.
I've tried a couple of approaches, but disabling the warning on
these functions seems to be the best approach.
Fixed #40129; bugfix on 0.4.4.1-alpha.
|
|
We set this flag if we've launched the connection in order to
satisfy an origin circuit, or when we decide the connection _would_
satisfy an origin circuit. These are the only or_connections we
want to consider for bootstrapping: other or_connections are opened
because of client EXTEND requests, and they may succeed or fail
because of the clients' confusion or misconfiguration.
Closes #25061.
|
|
Our code was using [01] as for the key type of signed->link certs,
which was incorrect. The value should be [03], to indicate that the
value as the SHA256 of an x.509 cert.
Fortunately, nothing cares about this value, so there shouldn't be
compatibility issues.
Fixes bug 40124; bugfix on 0.2.7.2-alpha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
tor_cert_create tor_cert_create_ed25519
It was generated with --no-verify, so it probably breaks some commit hooks.
The commiter should be sure to fix them up in a subsequent commit.
|
|
|
|
tl;dr We were not counting cells flying from the client to the service, but we
were counting cells flying from the service to the client.
When a rendezvous cell arrives from the client to the RP, the RP forwards it to
the service.
For this to happen, the cell first passes through command_process_relay_cell()
which normally does the statistics counting. However because the `rend_circ`
circuit was not flagged with `circuit_carries_hs_traffic_stats` in
rend_mid_rendezvous(), the cell is not counted there.
Then the cell goes to circuit_receive_relay_cell() which has a special code
block based on `rend_splice` specifically for rendezvous cells, and the cell
gets directly passed to `rend_circ` via a direct call to
circuit_receive_relay_cell(). The cell never passes through
command_process_relay_cell() ever again and hence is never counted by our
rephist module.
The fix here is to flag the `rend_circ` circuit with
`circuit_carries_hs_traffic_stats` so that the cell is counted as soon as it
hits command_process_relay_cell().
Furthermore we avoid double-counting cells since the special code block of
circuit_receive_relay_cell() makes us count rendezvous cells only as they enter
the RP and not as they exit it.
Fixes #40117.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously, we would treat *any* incoming circuit on a non-local
channel as meaning that our ORPort was reachable. With this patch,
we make sure that the address that the peer _says_ we have is the
same as the one we're trying to advertise right now.
Closes 20165. Bugfix on 4f5192b2803c706 in 0.1.0.1-rc, when
reachability self-tests were first introduced.
|
|
|
|
Fixes #40105.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of looking at the "Address" option alone, instead check if we have an
address in our cache (that is discovered by tor). If not, then it tells us
that tor does not have an address to work with so we can then ask a directory
authority for a suggestion.
Related #2178
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Turns out that the HS DoS defenses parameters were overwritten by the
consensus parameters everytime a new consensus would arrive.
This means that a service operator can still enable the defenses but as soon
as the intro point relay would get a new consensus, they would be overwritten.
And at this commit, the network is entirely disabling DoS defenses.
Fix this by introducing an "explicit" flag that indicate if the
ESTABLISH_INTRO cell DoS extension set those parameters or not. If set, avoid
using the consenus at once.
We are not bumping the protover HSIntro value for this because 0.4.2.x series
is EOL in 1 month and thus 0.4.3.x would be the only series with this bug. We
are confident that a backport and then upgrade path to the latest 0.4.4.x
stable coming up soon is enough to mitigate this problem in the coming months.
It avoids the upgrade path on the service side by keeping the requirement for
protover HSIntro=5.
Fixes #40109
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Closes #40101.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This turned into a new StreamStatus value.
Closes #40092. Bug not in any released Tor.
|
