aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/HACKING/CodingStandards.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/HACKING/CodingStandards.md')
-rw-r--r--doc/HACKING/CodingStandards.md117
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 50 deletions
diff --git a/doc/HACKING/CodingStandards.md b/doc/HACKING/CodingStandards.md
index 99bc3e5022..4f4b836a69 100644
--- a/doc/HACKING/CodingStandards.md
+++ b/doc/HACKING/CodingStandards.md
@@ -118,27 +118,32 @@ instance of the feature (--reverse).
For example, for #30224, we wanted to know when the bridge-distribution-request
feature was introduced into Tor:
- $ git log -S bridge-distribution-request --reverse
- commit ebab521525
- Author: Roger Dingledine <arma@torproject.org>
- Date: Sun Nov 13 02:39:16 2016 -0500
- Add new BridgeDistribution config option
+```console
+$ git log -S bridge-distribution-request --reverse commit ebab521525
+Author: Roger Dingledine <arma@torproject.org>
+Date: Sun Nov 13 02:39:16 2016 -0500
- $ git describe --contains ebab521525
- tor-0.3.2.3-alpha~15^2~4
+ Add new BridgeDistribution config option
+
+$ git describe --contains ebab521525
+tor-0.3.2.3-alpha~15^2~4
+```
If you need to know all the Tor versions that contain a commit, use:
- $ git tag --contains 9f2efd02a1 | sort -V
- tor-0.2.5.16
- tor-0.2.8.17
- tor-0.2.9.14
- tor-0.2.9.15
- ...
- tor-0.3.0.13
- tor-0.3.1.9
- tor-0.3.1.10
- ...
+
+```console
+$ git tag --contains 9f2efd02a1 | sort -V
+tor-0.2.5.16
+tor-0.2.8.17
+tor-0.2.9.14
+tor-0.2.9.15
+...
+tor-0.3.0.13
+tor-0.3.1.9
+tor-0.3.1.10
+...
+```
If at all possible, try to create the changes file in the same commit where
you are making the change. Please give it a distinctive name that no other
@@ -438,8 +443,10 @@ use `tor_assert_nonfatal()` in place of `tor_assert()`. If you'd like to
write a conditional that incorporates a nonfatal assertion, use the `BUG()`
macro, as in:
- if (BUG(ptr == NULL))
- return -1;
+```c
+if (BUG(ptr == NULL))
+ return -1;
+```
## Allocator conventions
@@ -451,33 +458,39 @@ Also, a type named `abc_t` should be freed by a function named `abc_free_()`.
Don't call this `abc_free_()` function directly -- instead, wrap it in a
macro called `abc_free()`, using the `FREE_AND_NULL` macro:
- void abc_free_(abc_t *obj);
- #define abc_free(obj) FREE_AND_NULL(abc_t, abc_free_, (obj))
+```c
+void abc_free_(abc_t *obj);
+#define abc_free(obj) FREE_AND_NULL(abc_t, abc_free_, (obj))
+```
This macro will free the underlying `abc_t` object, and will also set
the object pointer to NULL.
You should define all `abc_free_()` functions to accept NULL inputs:
- void
- abc_free_(abc_t *obj)
- {
- if (!obj)
- return;
- tor_free(obj->name);
- thing_free(obj->thing);
- tor_free(obj);
- }
+```c
+void
+abc_free_(abc_t *obj)
+{
+ if (!obj)
+ return;
+ tor_free(obj->name);
+ thing_free(obj->thing);
+ tor_free(obj);
+}
+```
If you need a free function that takes a `void *` argument (for example,
to use it as a function callback), define it with a name like
`abc_free_void()`:
- static void
- abc_free_void_(void *obj)
- {
- abc_free_(obj);
- }
+```c
+static void
+abc_free_void_(void *obj)
+{
+ abc_free_(obj);
+}
+```
When deallocating, don't say e.g. `if (x) tor_free(x)`. The convention is to
have deallocators do nothing when NULL pointer is passed.
@@ -488,24 +501,28 @@ Say what functions do as a series of one or more imperative sentences, as
though you were telling somebody how to be the function. In other words, DO
NOT say:
- /** The strtol function parses a number.
- *
- * nptr -- the string to parse. It can include whitespace.
- * endptr -- a string pointer to hold the first thing that is not part
- * of the number, if present.
- * base -- the numeric base.
- * returns: the resulting number.
- */
- long strtol(const char *nptr, char **nptr, int base);
+```c
+/** The strtol function parses a number.
+ *
+ * nptr -- the string to parse. It can include whitespace.
+ * endptr -- a string pointer to hold the first thing that is not part
+ * of the number, if present.
+ * base -- the numeric base.
+ * returns: the resulting number.
+ */
+long strtol(const char *nptr, char **nptr, int base);
+```
Instead, please DO say:
- /** Parse a number in radix <b>base</b> from the string <b>nptr</b>,
- * and return the result. Skip all leading whitespace. If
- * <b>endptr</b> is not NULL, set *<b>endptr</b> to the first character
- * after the number parsed.
- **/
- long strtol(const char *nptr, char **nptr, int base);
+```c
+/** Parse a number in radix <b>base</b> from the string <b>nptr</b>,
+ * and return the result. Skip all leading whitespace. If
+ * <b>endptr</b> is not NULL, set *<b>endptr</b> to the first character
+ * after the number parsed.
+ **/
+long strtol(const char *nptr, char **nptr, int base);
+```
Doxygen comments are the contract in our abstraction-by-contract world: if
the functions that call your function rely on it doing something, then your