| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
memclrNoHeapPointers is the underlying implementation of
typedmemclr and memclrHasPointers, so it still needs to write
pointer-aligned words atomically. Document this requirement.
Updates #41428.
Change-Id: Ice00dee5de7a96a50e51ff019fcef069e8a8406a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/287692
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
|
|
linux/s390x
Working toward making the tree vet-safe instead of having
so many exceptions in cmd/vet/all/whitelist.
This CL makes "go vet -unsafeptr=false runtime" happy for these GOOS/GOARCHes,
except for an unresolved complaint on mips/mipsle that is a bug in vet,
while keeping "GO_BUILDER_NAME=misc-vetall go tool dist test" happy too.
For #31916.
Change-Id: I6ef7e982a2fdbbfbc22cee876ca37ac54d8109e5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/176102
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
|
|
The function signatures in the comments used a C-like style. Using
Go function signatures is cleaner.
Change-Id: I1a093ed8fe5df59f3697c613cf3fce58bba4f5c1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/113876
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
Since barrier-less memclr is only safe in very narrow circumstances,
this commit renames memclr to avoid accidentally calling memclr on
typed memory. This can cause subtle, non-deterministic bugs, so it's
worth some effort to prevent. In the near term, this will also prevent
bugs creeping in from any concurrent CLs that add calls to memclr; if
this happens, whichever patch hits master second will fail to compile.
This also adds the other new memclr variants to the compiler's
builtin.go to minimize the churn on that binary blob. We'll use these
in future commits.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: I00eead049f5bd35ca107ea525966831f3d1ed9ca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31369
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
|
|
The new SSA backend for s390x can use R0 as a general purpose register.
This change modifies assembly code to either avoid using R0 entirely
or explicitly set R0 to 0.
R0 can still be safely used as 0 in address calculations.
Change-Id: I3efa723e9ef322a91a408bd8c31768d7858526c8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/28976
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I51c0a332e3cbdab348564e5dcd27583e75e4b881
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20946
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
