summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test/test_introduce.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-06-11Add -Wmissing-variable-declarations, with attendant fixesNick Mathewson
This is a big-ish patch, but it's very straightforward. Under this clang warning, we're not actually allowed to have a global variable without a previous extern declaration for it. The cases where we violated this rule fall into three roughly equal groups: * Stuff that should have been static. * Stuff that was global but where the extern was local to some other C file. * Stuff that was only global when built for the unit tests, that needed a conditional extern in the headers. The first two were IMO genuine problems; the last is a wart of how we build tests.
2016-02-27Update the copyright year.Nick Mathewson
2015-01-02Bump copyright dates to 2015, in case someday this matters.Nick Mathewson
2014-11-12Replace operators used as macro arguments with OP_XX macrosNick Mathewson
Part of fix for 13172
2014-10-28Add another year to our copyright dates.Nick Mathewson
Because in 95 years, we or our successors will surely care about enforcing the BSD license terms on this code. Right?
2014-09-16Remove the legacy_test_helper and legacy_setup wrappersNick Mathewson
These wrappers went into place when the default type for our unit test functions changed from "void fn(void)" to "void fn(void *arg)". To generate this patch, I did the same hokey-pokey as before with replacing all operators used as macro arguments, then I ran a coccinelle script, then I ran perl script to fix up everything that used legacy_test_helper, then I manually removed the legacy_test_helper functions, then I ran a final perl script to put the operators back how they were. ============================== #!/usr/bin/perl -w -i -p s/==,/_X_EQ_,/g; s/!=,/_X_NE_,/g; s/<,/_X_LT_,/g; s/>,/_X_GT_,/g; s/>=,/_X_GEQ_,/g; s/<=,/_X_LEQ_,/g; -------------------- @@ identifier func =~ "test_.*$"; statement S, S2; @@ static void func ( -void +void *arg ) { ... when != S2 +(void) arg; S ... } -------------------- #!/usr/bin/perl -w -i -p s/, *legacy_test_helper, *([^,]+), *\&legacy_setup, *([^\}]+) *}/, $2, $1, NULL, NULL }/g; -------------------- #!/usr/bin/perl -w -i -p s/_X_NEQ_/!=/g; s/_X_NE_/!=/g; s/_X_EQ_/==/g; s/_X_GT_/>/g; s/_X_LT_/</g; s/_X_GEQ_/>=/g; s/_X_LEQ_/<=/g; --------------------
2014-09-15Use coccinelle scripts to clean up our unit testsNick Mathewson
This should get rid of most of the users of the old test_* functions. Some are in macros and will need manual cleanup, though. This patch is for 13119, and was automatically generated with these scripts. The perl scripts are there because coccinelle hates operators as macro arguments. ------------------------------ s/==,/_X_EQ_,/g; s/!=,/_X_NE_,/g; s/<,/_X_LT_,/g; s/>,/_X_GT_,/g; s/>=,/_X_GEQ_,/g; s/<=,/_X_LEQ_,/g; ------------------------------ @@ expression a; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -test_fail_msg +TT_DIE ( +( a +) ) ...> } @@ identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -test_fail() +TT_DIE(("Assertion failed.")) ...> } @@ expression a; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -test_assert +tt_assert (a) ...> } @@ expression a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -test_eq +tt_int_op (a, +_X_EQ_, b) ...> } @@ expression a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -test_neq +tt_int_op (a, +_X_NEQ_, b) ...> } @@ expression a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -test_streq +tt_str_op (a, +_X_EQ_, b) ...> } @@ expression a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -test_strneq +tt_str_op (a, +_X_NEQ_, b) ...> } @@ expression a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -test_eq_ptr +tt_ptr_op (a, +_X_EQ_, b) ...> } @@ expression a, b; identifier func; @@ func() { <... -test_neq_ptr +tt_ptr_op (a, +_X_NEQ_, b) ...> } @@ expression a, b, len; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -test_memeq +tt_mem_op (a, +_X_EQ_, b, len) ...> } @@ expression a, b, len; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -test_memneq +tt_mem_op (a, +_X_NEQ_, b, len) ...> } ------------------------------ @@ char a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a == b +a, _X_EQ_, b ) ...> } @@ int a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a == b +a, _X_EQ_, b ) ...> } @@ long a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a == b +a, _X_EQ_, b ) ...> } @@ unsigned int a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_uint_op ( -a == b +a, _X_EQ_, b ) ...> } @@ unsigned long a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_uint_op ( -a == b +a, _X_EQ_, b ) ...> } @@ char a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a != b +a, _X_NEQ_, b ) ...> } @@ int a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a != b +a, _X_NEQ_, b ) ...> } @@ long a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a != b +a, _X_NEQ_, b ) ...> } @@ unsigned int a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_uint_op ( -a != b +a, _X_NEQ_, b ) ...> } @@ unsigned long a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_uint_op ( -a != b +a, _X_NEQ_, b ) ...> } @@ char a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a >= b +a, _X_GEQ_, b ) ...> } @@ int a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a >= b +a, _X_GEQ_, b ) ...> } @@ long a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a >= b +a, _X_GEQ_, b ) ...> } @@ unsigned int a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_uint_op ( -a >= b +a, _X_GEQ_, b ) ...> } @@ unsigned long a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_uint_op ( -a >= b +a, _X_GEQ_, b ) ...> } @@ char a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a <= b +a, _X_LEQ_, b ) ...> } @@ int a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a <= b +a, _X_LEQ_, b ) ...> } @@ long a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a <= b +a, _X_LEQ_, b ) ...> } @@ unsigned int a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_uint_op ( -a <= b +a, _X_LEQ_, b ) ...> } @@ unsigned long a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_uint_op ( -a <= b +a, _X_LEQ_, b ) ...> } @@ char a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a > b +a, _X_GT_, b ) ...> } @@ int a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a > b +a, _X_GT_, b ) ...> } @@ long a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a > b +a, _X_GT_, b ) ...> } @@ unsigned int a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_uint_op ( -a > b +a, _X_GT_, b ) ...> } @@ unsigned long a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_uint_op ( -a > b +a, _X_GT_, b ) ...> } @@ char a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a < b +a, _X_LT_, b ) ...> } @@ int a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a < b +a, _X_LT_, b ) ...> } @@ long a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_int_op ( -a < b +a, _X_LT_, b ) ...> } @@ unsigned int a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_uint_op ( -a < b +a, _X_LT_, b ) ...> } @@ unsigned long a, b; identifier func; @@ func (...) { <... -tt_assert +tt_uint_op ( -a < b +a, _X_LT_, b ) ...> } ------------------------------ s/_X_NEQ_/!=/g; s/_X_NE_/!=/g; s/_X_EQ_/==/g; s/_X_GT_/>/g; s/_X_LT_/</g; s/_X_GEQ_/>=/g; s/_X_LEQ_/<=/g; s/test_mem_op\(/tt_mem_op\(/g;
2013-01-16Update the copyright date to 201.Nick Mathewson
2012-08-03Fix a bunch of "implicit 64->32" warnings from introduce refactoringNick Mathewson
2012-07-31test_assert is always in affect: no need for extra gotosNick Mathewson
2012-07-31Remove duplicate code in test_introduce.cNick Mathewson
Two of the do_*_test functions were actually prefixes of the third, which suggests a trivial code elimination step
2012-07-31Unit tests for new rend_intro_cell_t parserAndrea Shepard
7apu2bq3rhoylwmucxizk54afw5jyda7pho4j5zdcqpwkufke7zdzwad.onion