| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The directory_fetches_from_authorities() is used to know if a client or relay
should fetch data from an authority early in the boot process.
We had a condition in that function that made a relay trigger that fetch if it
didn't know its address (so we can learn it). However, when this is called,
the address discovery has not been done yet so it would always return true for
a relay.
Furthermore, it would always trigger a log notice that the IPv4 couldn't be
found which was inevitable because the address discovery process has not been
done yet (done when building our first descriptor).
It is also important to point out that starting in 0.4.5.1-alpha, asking an
authority for an address is done during address discovery time using a one-hop
circuit thus independent from the relay deciding to fetch or not documents
from an authority.
Small fix also is to reverse the "IPv(4|6)Only" flag in the notice so that if
we can't find IPv6 it would output to use IPv4Only.
Fixes #40300
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
This is unfortunately massive but both functionalities were extremely
intertwined and it would have required us to actually change the HSv2 code in
order to be able to split this into multiple commits.
After this commit, there are still artefacts of v2 in the code but there is no
more support for service, intro point and HSDir.
The v2 support for rendezvous circuit is still available since that code is
the same for the v3 and we will leave it in so if a client is able to
rendezvous on v2 then it can still transfer traffic. Once the entire network
has moved away from v2, we can remove v2 rendezvous point support.
Related to #40266
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Related to #40266
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
|
|
The comment of that specific unit test wanted 4 ORPorts but for some reasons
we tested for 3 which before the previous commit related to #40289, test would
pass but it was in fact wrong.
Now the code is correct and 4 was in fact correct expected number of ports.
Related to #40289
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
In other words, if PublishServerDescriptor is set to 0 and AssumeReachable to
1, then allow a relay to hold a RFC1918 address.
Reasons for this are documented in #40208
Fixes #40208
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
We used to actually discard ORPorts that were the same port and same family
but they could have different address.
Instead, we need to keep all different ORPorts so we can bind a listener on
each of them. We will publish only one of these in our descriptor though.
Related to #40246
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commit c3a0f757964de0e8a24911d72abff5df20bb323c added this feature for ORPort
that we ignore any port that is not the family of our default address when
parsing the port. So if port_parse_config() was called with an IPv4 default
address, all IPv6 address would be ignored.
That makes sense for ORPort since we call twice port_parse_config() for
0.0.0.0 and [::] but for the rest of the ports, it is not good since a
perfectly valid configuration can be:
SocksPort 9050
SocksPort [::1]:9050
Any non-ORPort only binds by default to an IPv4 except the ORPort that binds
to both IPv4 and IPv6 by default.
The fix here is to always parse all ports within port_parse_config() and then,
specifically for ORPort, remove the duplicates or superseding ones. The
warning is only emitted when a port supersedes another.
A unit tests is added to make sure SocksPort of different family always exists
together.
Fixes #40183
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Typos found with codespell.
Please keep in mind that this should have impact on actual code
and must be carefully evaluated:
src/core/or/lttng_circuit.inc
- ctf_enum_value("CONTROLER", CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER)
+ ctf_enum_value("CONTROLLER", CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER)
|
|
We can use our existing mocking functionality to do this: We have
been in this position before.
Fixes part of #40179; bugfix on 0.4.3.1-alpha.
|
|
|
|
Make the unit test pass by including an explicit IPv6 port and an
implicit IPv4 port. See comments for more details.
|
|
Enum allows us to easily compare what is being returned but also better
semantic to the code.
Related #33247
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
This commit makes it that if the ORPort is set with a single port, it will
bind to both global listen IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
To pin an "ORPort <PORT>" to be IPv4 or IPv6, the IPv4Only/IPv6Only flags are
honored thus this will _only_ bind on IPv6 for that port value:
ORPort 9050 IPv6Only
Results in: [::]:9050
ORPort 9051 IPv4Only
Results in: [0.0.0.0]:9051
Attempting to configure an explicit IPv4 address with IPv6Only flag is an
error and vice versa.
Closes #33246
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Rationale: these don't actually give the first advertised
address/port, but instead give us the first such port that we are
_configured_ to advertise. Putting them in a portconf_ namespace
therefore makes sense.
Similarly, there are no other functions that get the first
configured advertised addr/port, so the "by_type_af()" part is needless.
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
get_first_advertised_addr_by_type_af portconf_get_first_advertised_addr \
get_first_advertised_port_by_type_af portconf_get_first_advertised_port
|
|
This option controls if a tor relay will attempt address auto discovery and
thus ultimately publish an IPv6 ORPort in the descriptor.
Behavior is from proposal 312 section 3.2.6.
Closes #33245
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Instead of a boolean saying "cache_only" add the concept of flags so we add
semantic through out the code and allow ourselves to have more options in the
future.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Remove use of router_pick_published_address() and use
relay_find_addr_to_publish instead.
Related to #40025
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Commit b14b1f2b1d9 was a mistake.
In case an Address statement is missing for the wanted family but another one
exists for another family, simply continue the address discovery.
It is not a mistake to be missing an Address statement for a family because
the address could simply be discovered by the next methods. Not all address
family requires a specific Address statement.
However, we do bail if we couldn't find any valid address for the requested
family _and_ a resolve failed meaning we had a hostname but couldn't resolve
it. In that case, we can't know if that hostname would have been for v4 or v6
thus we can't continue the address discovery properly.
Couple unit tests case were removed to match this reality.
Related #40025
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Tests that used options_init_from_string were not freeing calling
config_free_all().
|
|
Also adds generic tor_glob function to expand globs.
|
|
This changes a LOT of code but in the end, behavior is the same.
Unfortunately, many functions had to be changed to accomodate but in majority
of cases, to become simpler.
Functions are also removed specifically those that were there to convert an
IPv4 as a host format to a tor_addr_t. Those are not needed anymore.
The IPv4 address field has been standardized to "ipv4_addr", the ORPort to
"ipv4_orport" (currently IPv6 uses ipv6_orport) and DirPort to "ipv4_dirport".
This is related to Sponsor 55 work that adds IPv6 support for relays and this
work is needed in order to have a common interface between IPv4 and IPv6.
Closes #40043.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit bf2a399fc0d90df76e091fa3259f7c1b8fb87781.
Don't set by default the prefer IPv6 feature on client ports because it breaks
the torsocks use case. The SOCKS resolve command is lacking a mechanism to ask
for a specific address family (v4 or v6) thus prioritizing IPv6 when an IPv4
address is asked on the resolve SOCKS interface resulting in a failure.
Tor Browser explicitly set PreferIPv6 so this should not affect the majority
of our users.
Closes #33796
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
If no Address statement are found in the configuration file, attempt to learn
our address by looking at the ORPort address if any. Specifying an address is
optional so if we can't find one, it is fine, we move on to the next discovery
mechanism.
Note that specifying a hostname on the ORPort is not yet supported at this
commit.
Closes #33236
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
|
|
Unit tests also suffered from a memleak.
Closes #40024
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
The find_my_address() function now prioritize the local interface over the
local hostname when guessing the IP address.
See proposal 312, section 3.2.1, general case:
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/proposals/312-relay-auto-ipv6-addr.txt#n359
The entire unit tests had to be refactored to make this possible. Instead of
hot patching it, it has been rewritten to cover all possible cases and the
test interface has been changed to accomodate both IPv4 and IPv6 in order for
them to be tested identically.
Closes #33238
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
This unit tests validates the use of IPv4 _and_ IPv6 together as in multiple
option Address lines both addresses and hostnames.
Closes #33235
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Replace it by find_my_address() everywhere. This changes many parts of the
code that uses it to use a tor_addr_t instead of a plain uint32_t for IPv4.
Many changes to the unit test to also use the new interface.
Part #33233
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
In order to transition smoothly, maek resolve_my_address_v4() call the new
fancy find_my_address() with AF_INET.
Next commits should remove the use of resolve_my_address_v4() accross the code
to use find_my_address().
This commit is so the unit tests would be more easily fixed and port to the
new find_my_address() internals.
Part of #33233.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Part of #33233
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
With prop312, we want to support IPv4 and IPv6 thus multiple Address statement
(up to 2) will be accepted.
For this, "Address" option becomes a LINELIST so we can properly process the
IPv4 or/and IPv6.
Part of #33233
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
New name is more accurate semantically.
Closes #33789
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Move a series of function from config.c into that new file which is related to
address resolving.
Part of #33789
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
This commit moves router_pick_published_address() and the related helper
functions into the new file.
The log_addr_has_changed() function has been made public in router.h so we can
use it in relay_resolve_addr.c.
This is a refactoring as part of Sponsor 55. Only code movement at this
commit.
Part of #33789
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
This change broke torsocks that by default is expecting an IPv4 for hostname
resolution because it can't ask tor for a specific IP version with the SOCKS5
extension.
PreferIPv6 made it that sometimes the IPv6 could be returned to torsocks that
was expecting an IPv4.
Torsocks is probably a very unique case because the runtime flow is that it
hijacks DNS resolution (ex: getaddrinfo()), gets an IP and then sends it back
for the connect() to happen.
The libc has DNS resolution functions that allows the caller to request a
specific INET family but torsocks can't tell tor to resolve the hostname only
to an IPv4 or IPv6 and thus by default fallsback to IPv4.
Reverting this change into 0.4.3.x series but we'll keep it in the 0.4.4.x
series in the hope that we add this SOCKS5 extension to tor for DNS resolution
and then change torsocks to use that.
Fixes #33804
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Merge static function declaration deletions from bug32588_042 and
maint-0.4.3 in app/config/config.c.
|
|
|
|
Merge tests from maint-0.4.1 with new tests from bug32588_035
in test_router.c.
|
|
|
