| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
base16_decodes() now returns the number of decoded bytes. It's interface
changes from returning a "int" to a "ssize_t". Every callsite now checks the
returned value.
Fixes #14013
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
So, back long ago, XXX012 meant, "before Tor 0.1.2 is released, we
had better revisit this comment and fix it!"
But we have a huge pile of such comments accumulated for a large
number of released versions! Not cool.
So, here's what I tried to do:
* 0.2.9 and 0.2.8 are retained, since those are not yet released.
* XXX+ or XXX++ or XXX++++ or whatever means, "This one looks
quite important!"
* The others, after one-by-one examination, are downgraded to
plain old XXX. Which doesn't mean they aren't a problem -- just
that they cannot possibly be a release-blocking problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no behavior changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
fix the logic in one of the comments
|
|
|
|
Comment only change
|
|
When we connect to a hidden service as a client we may need three internal
circuits, one for the descriptor retrieval, introduction, and rendezvous.
Let's try to make sure we have them. Closes #13239.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
|
|
This lets us use optimistic data for downloading our initial
consensus.
Closes ticket 18815.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
src/or/directory.c
src/test/test_routerlist.c
Fix minor conflicts.
|
|
Modify callers to correctly handle these new NULL returns:
* fix assert in onion_extend_cpath
* warn and discard circuit in circuit_get_open_circ_or_launch
* warn, discard circuit, and tell controller in handle_control_extendcircuit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avoid using gender for things that don't have it.
Avoid assigning a gender to tor users.
|
|
|
|
Now we only re-scan the list in the cases we did before: when we
have a new circuit that we should try attaching to, or when we have
added a new stream that we haven't tried to attach yet.
This is part of 17590.
|
|
Long ago we used to call connection_ap_handshake_attach_circuit()
only in a few places, since connection_ap_attach_pending() attaches
all the pending connections, and does so regularly. But this turned
out to have a performance problem: it would introduce a delay to
launching or connecting a stream.
We couldn't just call connection_ap_attach_pending() every time we
make a new connection, since it walks the whole connection list. So
we started calling connection_ap_attach_pending all over, instead!
But that's kind of ugly and messes up our callgraph.
So instead, we now have connection_ap_attach_pending() use a list
only of the pending connections, so we can call it much more
frequently. We have a separate function to scan the whole
connection array to see if we missed adding anything, and log a
warning if so.
Closes ticket #17590
|
|
This controls the circuit dirtyness reset behavior added for Tor
Browser's user experience fix (#15482). Unlike previous iterations
of this patch, the tunable actually works, and is documented.
|
|
Only applies to connections with SOCKS auth set, so that non-web Tor
activity is not affected.
Simpler version of Nick's patch because the randomness worried me, and I'm not
otherwise sure why we want a max here.
|
|
|
|
Task #15824
|
|
|
|
|
|
When we ran out of intro points for a hidden service (which could
happen on a newnym), we would change the connection's state back to
"waiting for hidden service descriptor." But this would make an
assertion fail if we went on to call circuit_get_open_circ_or_launch
again.
This fixes bug 16013; I believe the bug was introduced in
38be533c69417aacf28cedec1c3bae808ce29f4, where we made it possible for
circuit_get_open_circ_or_launch() to change the connection's state.
|
|
Fixes #16260
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
|
|
|
|
When set, this limits the maximum number of simultaneous streams per
rendezvous circuit on the server side of a HS, with further RELAY_BEGIN
cells being silently ignored.
This can be modified via "HiddenServiceMaxStreamsCloseCircuit", which
if set will cause offending rendezvous circuits to be torn down instead.
Addresses part of #16052.
|
|
Stop using an onion address since it's not indexed with that anymore in the
last hid serv request cache. Instead use a base32 encoded descriptor ID
contained in the rend_data_t object.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
src/or/circuituse.c
src/test/include.am
src/test/test_entrynodes.c
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tor can now build circuits from a consensus with no exits.
But if it tries to build exit circuits, they fail and flood the logs.
The circuit types in the Exit Circuits list below will only be
built if the current consensus has exits. If it doesn't,
only the Internal Circuits will be built. (This can change
with each new consensus.)
Fixes bug #13814, causes fewer path failures due to #13817.
Exit Circuits:
Predicted Exit Circuits
User Traffic Circuits
Most AP Streams
Circuits Marked Exit
Build Timeout Circuits (with exits)
Internal Circuits:
Hidden Service Server Circuits
Hidden Service Client Circuits
Hidden Service AP Streams
Hidden Service Intro Point Streams
Circuits Marked Internal
Build Timeout Circuits (with no exits)
Other Circuits?
|
|
|
|
In circuit_get_open_circ_or_launch(), for a rendezvous circuit,
rend_client_rendcirc_has_opened() but circuit_has_opened() is preferred here
since it will call the right function for a specific circuit purpose.
Furthermore, a controller event is triggered where the former did not.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
|
|
Part of fix for 13172
|
|
Fixes bug 13701.
|
|
Because in 95 years, we or our successors will surely care about
enforcing the BSD license terms on this code. Right?
|
|
Allow clients to use optimistic data when connecting to a hidden service,
which should cut out the initial round-trip for client-side programs
including Tor Browser.
(Now that Tor 0.2.2.x is obsolete, all hidden services should support
server-side optimistic data.)
See proposal 181 for details. Implements ticket 13211.
|
|
I think we should know the routerstatus for our exit relay, since
we built a circuit to it. So I think this is just a code simplication.
|
|
Clients are now willing to send optimistic circuit data (before they
receive a 'connected' cell) to relays of any version. We used to
only do it for relays running 0.2.3.1-alpha or later, but now all
relays are new enough.
Resolves ticket 13153.
|
|
|
