| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
fixes bug 4124, as noticed in bug 4115
|
|
|
|
For printf, %f and %lf are synonymous, since floats are promoted to
doubles when passed as varargs. It's only for scanf that we need to
say "%lf" for doubles and "%f" for floats.
Apparenly, some older compilers think it's naughty to say %lf and like
to spew warnings about it.
Found by grarpamp.
|
|
It had some cpp stuff inside, and older GCCs don't like preprocessor
directives inside macro arguments.
Found by grarpamp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you had configured a bridge but then switched to a different bridge
via the controller, you would still be willing to use the old one.
|
|
Conflicts:
src/or/circuitbuild.c
|
|
|
|
Most instances were dead code; for those, I removed the assignments.
Some were pieces of info we don't currently plan to use, but which
we might in the future. For those, I added an explicit cast-to-void
to indicate that we know that the thing's unused. Finally, one was
a case where we were testing the wrong variable in a unit test.
That one I fixed.
This resolves bug 3208.
|
|
|
|
Fixes bug 2313; bugfix on 0.2.2.26-beta.
|
|
This patch introduces a few new functions in router.c to produce a
more helpful description of a node than its nickame, and then tweaks
nearly all log messages taking a nickname as an argument to call these
functions instead.
There are a few cases where I left the old log messages alone: in
these cases, the nickname was that of an authority (whose nicknames
are useful and unique), or the message already included an identity
and/or an address. I might have missed a couple more too.
This is a fix for bug 3045.
|
|
This code changes it so that we don't remove bridges immediately when
we start re-parsing our configuration. Instead, we mark them all, and
remove all the marked ones after re-parsing our bridge lines. As we
add a bridge, we see if it's already in the list. If so, we just
unmark it.
This new behavior will lose the property we used to have that bridges
were in bridge_list in the same order in which they appeared in the
torrc. I took a quick look through the code, and I'm pretty sure we
didn't actually depend on that anywhere.
This is for bug 3019; it's a fix on 0.2.0.3-alpha.
|
|
bug3122_memcmp_022
Conflicts throughout. All resolved in favor of taking HEAD and
adding tor_mem* or fast_mem* ops as appropriate.
src/common/Makefile.am
src/or/circuitbuild.c
src/or/directory.c
src/or/dirserv.c
src/or/dirvote.c
src/or/networkstatus.c
src/or/rendclient.c
src/or/rendservice.c
src/or/router.c
src/or/routerlist.c
src/or/routerparse.c
src/or/test.c
|
|
Here I looked at the results of the automated conversion and cleaned
them up as follows:
If there was a tor_memcmp or tor_memeq that was in fact "safe"[*] I
changed it to a fast_memcmp or fast_memeq.
Otherwise if there was a tor_memcmp that could turn into a
tor_memneq or tor_memeq, I converted it.
This wants close attention.
[*] I'm erring on the side of caution here, and leaving some things
as tor_memcmp that could in my opinion use the data-dependent
fast_memcmp variant.
|
|
This commit is _exactly_ the result of
perl -i -pe 's/\bmemcmp\(/tor_memcmp\(/g' src/*/*.[ch]
perl -i -pe 's/\!\s*tor_memcmp\(/tor_memeq\(/g' src/*/*.[ch]
perl -i -pe 's/0\s*==\s*tor_memcmp\(/tor_memeq\(/g' src/*/*.[ch]
perl -i -pe 's/0\s*!=\s*tor_memcmp\(/tor_memneq\(/g' src/*/*.[ch]
git checkout src/common/di_ops.[ch]
git checkout src/or/test.c
git checkout src/common/test.h
|
|
This possible div by 0 warning from clang's analyzer was quite fun to
track down. Turns out the current behaviour is safe.
|
|
Trivial fix for 3079.
|
|
|
|
|
|
these still aren't perfect, but we won't know how to correct them until
we start experiencing surprised users.
|
|
Now we believe it to be the case that we never build a circuit for our
stream that has an unsuitable exit, so we'll never need to use such
a circuit. The risk is that we have some code that builds the circuit,
but now we refuse to use it, meaning we just build a bazillion circuits
and ignore them all.
|
|
We had a circuit_purpose_to_controller_string() function, but it was
pretty coarse-grained and didn't try to be human-readable.
|
|
Also add a request to report any cases where we are not honoring
StrictNodes to the developers: These should now all be bugs.
|
|
circuit
We could probably do something smarter here, but the situation is
unusual enough that it's okay to just fail the circuit.
|
|
|
|
This once maybe made sense when ExitNodes meant "Here are 3 exits;
use them all", but now it more typically means "Here are 3
countries; exit from there." Using non-Fast/Stable exits created a
potential partitioning opportunity and an annoying stability
problem.
(Don't worry about the case where all of our ExitNodes are non-Fast
or non-Stable: we handle that later in the function by retrying with
need_capacity and need_uptime set to 0.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also, ExitNodes are always strict.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
src/or/or.h
|
|
We've got millisecond timers now, we might as well use them.
This change won't actually make circuits get expiered with microsecond
precision, since we only call the expiry functions once per second.
Still, it should avoid the situation where we have a circuit get
expired too early because of rounding.
A couple of the expiry functions now call tor_gettimeofday: this
should be cheap since we're only doing it once per second. If it gets
to be called more often, though, we should onsider having the current
time be an argument again.
|
|
Remove some, postpone others, leave some alone. Now the only
remaining XXX022s are ones that seem important to fix or investigate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is based on shitlei's fix for bug2629, with extra parens removed.
Fixes bug 2629, bugfix on 0.2.1.2-alpha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When calling circuit_build_times_shuffle_and_store_array, we were
passing a uint32_t as an int. arma is pretty sure that this can't
actually cause a bug, because of checks elsewhere in the code, but
it's best not to pass a uint32_t as an int anyway.
Found by doorss; fix on 0.2.2.4-alpha.
|
|
Left circuit_build_times_get_bw_scale() uncommented because it is in the wrong
place due to an improper bug2317 fix. It needs to be moved and renamed, as it
is not a cbt parameter.
|
|
To quote arma: "So instead of stopping your CBT from screaming, you're just
going to throw it in the closet and hope you can't hear it?"
Yep. The log message can happen because at 95% point on the curve, we can be
way beyond the max timeout we've seen, if the curve has few points and is
shallow.
Also applied Nick's rule of thumb for rewriting some other notice log messages
to read like how you would explain them to a raving lunatic on #tor who was
shouting at you demanding what they meant. Hopefully the changes live up to
that standard.
|
|
This addresses Nick's concern about doing non-constant bounds checking
inside networkstatus_get_param().
|
