| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
So, back long ago, XXX012 meant, "before Tor 0.1.2 is released, we
had better revisit this comment and fix it!"
But we have a huge pile of such comments accumulated for a large
number of released versions! Not cool.
So, here's what I tried to do:
* 0.2.9 and 0.2.8 are retained, since those are not yet released.
* XXX+ or XXX++ or XXX++++ or whatever means, "This one looks
quite important!"
* The others, after one-by-one examination, are downgraded to
plain old XXX. Which doesn't mean they aren't a problem -- just
that they cannot possibly be a release-blocking problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because in 95 years, we or our successors will surely care about
enforcing the BSD license terms on this code. Right?
|
|
Breaks compilation.
Used this coccinelle script:
@@
identifier c;
typedef circuit_t;
iterator name TOR_LIST_FOREACH;
iterator name SMARTLIST_FOREACH_BEGIN;
statement S;
@@
- circuit_t *c;
...
- TOR_LIST_FOREACH(c, \(&global_circuitlist\|circuit_get_global_list()\), head)
+ SMARTLIST_FOREACH_BEGIN(circuit_get_global_list(), circuit_t *, c)
S
+ SMARTLIST_FOREACH_END(c);
|
|
|
|
That was the tricky part
|
|
Does not compile yet. This is the "no code changed" diff.
|
