| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This is the loudest of our LOG_PROTOCOL_WARN messages, it can occur
naturally, and there doesn't seem to be a great response to it.
Partial fix for 40400; bugfix on 0.1.1.13-alpha.
|
|
|
|
Related to #40266
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
This is unfortunately massive but both functionalities were extremely
intertwined and it would have required us to actually change the HSv2 code in
order to be able to split this into multiple commits.
After this commit, there are still artefacts of v2 in the code but there is no
more support for service, intro point and HSDir.
The v2 support for rendezvous circuit is still available since that code is
the same for the v3 and we will leave it in so if a client is able to
rendezvous on v2 then it can still transfer traffic. Once the entire network
has moved away from v2, we can remove v2 rendezvous point support.
Related to #40266
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Remove it from rendservice.c and move everything related to hs_common.{c|h}.
Related to #40266
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Related to #40266
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This one should work on GCC _and_ on Clang. The previous version
made Clang happier by not having unreachable "fallthrough"
statements, but made GCC sad because GCC didn't think that the
unconditional failures were really unconditional, and therefore
_wanted_ a FALLTHROUGH.
This patch adds a FALLTHROUGH_UNLESS_ALL_BUGS_ARE_FATAL macro that
seems to please both GCC and Clang in this case: ordinarily it is a
FALLTHROUGH, but when ALL_BUGS_ARE_FATAL is defined, it's an
abort().
Fixes bug 40241 again. Bugfix on earlier fix for 40241, which was
merged into maint-0.3.5 and forward, and released in 0.4.5.3-rc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We're getting "fallback annotation annotation in unreachable code"
warnings when we build with ALL_BUGS_ARE_FATAL. This patch fixes
that.
Fixes bug 40241. Bugfix on 0.3.5.4-alpha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Typos found with codespell.
Please keep in mind that this should have impact on actual code
and must be carefully evaluated:
src/core/or/lttng_circuit.inc
- ctf_enum_value("CONTROLER", CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER)
+ ctf_enum_value("CONTROLLER", CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER)
|
|
|
|
|
|
If at least one service is configured as a version 2, a log warning is emitted
once and only once.
Closes #40003
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
|
|
tl;dr We were not counting cells flying from the client to the service, but we
were counting cells flying from the service to the client.
When a rendezvous cell arrives from the client to the RP, the RP forwards it to
the service.
For this to happen, the cell first passes through command_process_relay_cell()
which normally does the statistics counting. However because the `rend_circ`
circuit was not flagged with `circuit_carries_hs_traffic_stats` in
rend_mid_rendezvous(), the cell is not counted there.
Then the cell goes to circuit_receive_relay_cell() which has a special code
block based on `rend_splice` specifically for rendezvous cells, and the cell
gets directly passed to `rend_circ` via a direct call to
circuit_receive_relay_cell(). The cell never passes through
command_process_relay_cell() ever again and hence is never counted by our
rephist module.
The fix here is to flag the `rend_circ` circuit with
`circuit_carries_hs_traffic_stats` so that the cell is counted as soon as it
hits command_process_relay_cell().
Furthermore we avoid double-counting cells since the special code block of
circuit_receive_relay_cell() makes us count rendezvous cells only as they enter
the RP and not as they exit it.
Fixes #40117.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We used to have a single boolean, "FascistFirewall". Ages ago, in
tickets #17840 and #9067, we added an improved "ReachableAddresses"
mechanism. It's time to rename related identifiers in the code for
consistency. This closes #18106.
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
fascist_firewall_allows_address reachable_addr_allows \
fascist_firewall_use_ipv6 reachable_addr_use_ipv6 \
fascist_firewall_prefer_ipv6_impl reachable_addr_prefer_ipv6_impl \
fascist_firewall_prefer_ipv6_orport reachable_addr_prefer_ipv6_orport \
fascist_firewall_prefer_ipv6_dirport reachable_addr_prefer_ipv6_dirport \
fascist_firewall_allows_address_addr reachable_addr_allows_addr \
fascist_firewall_allows_address_ap reachable_addr_allows_ap \
fascist_firewall_allows_base reachable_addr_allows_base \
fascist_firewall_allows_ri_impl reachable_addr_allows_ri_impl \
fascist_firewall_allows_rs_impl reachable_addr_allows_rs_impl \
fascist_firewall_allows_rs reachable_addr_allows_rs \
fascist_firewall_allows_md_impl reachable_addr_allows_md_impl \
fascist_firewall_allows_node reachable_addr_allows_node \
fascist_firewall_allows_dir_server reachable_addr_allows_dir_server \
fascist_firewall_choose_address_impl reachable_addr_choose_impl \
fascist_firewall_choose_address reachable_addr_choose \
fascist_firewall_choose_address_base reachable_addr_choose_base \
fascist_firewall_choose_address_rs reachable_addr_choose_from_rs \
fascist_firewall_choose_address_ls reachable_addr_choose_from_ls \
fascist_firewall_choose_address_node reachable_addr_choose_from_node \
fascist_firewall_choose_address_dir_server reachable_addr_choose_from_dir_server
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes ticket 17793
|
|
This changes a LOT of code but in the end, behavior is the same.
Unfortunately, many functions had to be changed to accomodate but in majority
of cases, to become simpler.
Functions are also removed specifically those that were there to convert an
IPv4 as a host format to a tor_addr_t. Those are not needed anymore.
The IPv4 address field has been standardized to "ipv4_addr", the ORPort to
"ipv4_orport" (currently IPv6 uses ipv6_orport) and DirPort to "ipv4_dirport".
This is related to Sponsor 55 work that adds IPv6 support for relays and this
work is needed in order to have a common interface between IPv4 and IPv6.
Closes #40043.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If at least one service is configured as a version 2, a log warning is emitted
once and only once.
Closes #40003
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
In practice, there will be at most one ipv4 address and ipv6 address
for now, but this code is designed to not care which address is
which until forced to do so.
This patch does not yet actually create extend_info_t objects with
multiple addresses.
Closes #34069.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amazingly, this time we had no merge conflicts with "falls through" comments.
|
|
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
(In order to avoid conflicts, I'm applying this script separately to
each maint branch. This is the 0.4.3 version.)
|
|
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
(In order to avoid conflicts, I'm applying this script separately to
each maint branch. This is the 0.4.2 version.)
|
