| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows doesn't let you check the socket error for a socket with
WSAGetLastError() and getsockopt(SO_ERROR). But
getsockopt(SO_ERROR) clears the error on the socket, so you can't
call it more than once per error.
When we introduced recv_ni to help drain alert sockets, back in
0.2.6.3-alpha, we had the failure path for recv_ni call getsockopt()
twice, though: once to check for EINTR and one to check for EAGAIN.
Of course, we never got the eagain, so we treated it as an error,
and warned about: "No error".
The fix here is to have these functions return -errno on failure.
Fixes bug 21540; bugfix on 0.2.6.3-alpha.
|
|
Patch from toralf; closes 21729.
|
|
So we require that SMARTLIST_FOREACH_END() have the name of the loop
variable in it. But right now the only enforcement for that is to
clear the variable at the end of the loop, which is really not
sufficient: I spent 45 minutes earlier today debugging an issue
where I had said:
SMARTLIST_FOREACH_BEGIN(spool, spooled_resource_t *, spooled) {
...
} SMARTLIST_FOREACH_END(spool);
This patch makes it so that ONLY loop variables can be used, by
referring to the _sl_idx variable.
|
|
This patch removes the `tor_fgets()` wrapper around `fgets(3)` since it
is no longer needed. The function was created due to inconsistency
between the returned values of `fgets(3)` on different versions of Unix
when using `fgets(3)` on non-blocking file descriptors, but with the
recent changes in bug #21654 we switch from unbuffered to direct I/O on
non-blocking file descriptors in our utility module.
We continue to use `fgets(3)` directly in the geoip and dirserv module
since this usage is considered safe.
This patch also removes the test-case that was created to detect
differences in the implementation of `fgets(3)` as well as the changes
file since these changes was not included in any releases yet.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/21654
|
|
This patch changes a number of read loops in the util module to use
less-than comparison instead of not-equal-to comparison. We do this in
the case that we have a bug elsewhere that might cause `numread` to
become larger than `count` and thus become an infinite loop.
|
|
This patch removes the buffered I/O stream usage in process_handle_t and
its related utility functions. This simplifies the code and avoids racy
code where we used buffered I/O on non-blocking file descriptors.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/21654
|
|
This patch modifies `tor_read_all_handle()` to use read(2) instead of
fgets(3) when reading the stdout from the child process. This should
eliminate the race condition that can be triggered in the 'slow/util/*'
tests on slower machines running OpenBSD, FreeBSD and HardenedBSD.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/21654
|
|
This patch changes our use of fgets() to tor_fgets() for more consistent
error handling across different versions of the C library.
|
|
This patch adds the `tor_fgets()` function to our compatibility layer.
`tor_fgets()` adds an additional check for whether the error-bit have
been enabled for the given file stream, if that is the case and `errno`
is set to `EAGAIN` we make sure that we always return NULL.
Unfortunately `fgets(3)` behaves differently on different versions of
the C library.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/21416
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/20988
|
|
|
|
This feature makes it possible to turn off memory sentinels (like
those used for safety in buffers.c and memarea.c) when fuzzing, so
that we can catch bugs that they would otherwise prevent.
|
|
|
|
Since 0.2.4.11-alpha (in 0196647970a91d) we've tried to randomize
the start time to up to some time in the past. But unfortunately we
allowed the start time to be in the future as well, which isn't
really legit.
The new behavior lets the start time be be up to
MAX(cert_lifetime-2days, 0) in the past, but never in the future.
Fixes bug 21420; bugfix on 0.2.4.11-alpha.
|
|
|
|
Fixes bug 20894; bugfix on 0.2.0.16-alpha.
We already applied a workaround for this as 20834, so no need to
freak out (unless you didn't apply 20384 yet).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If tor_mmap_file is called with a file which is larger than SIZE_MAX,
only a small part of the file will be memory-mapped due to integer
truncation.
This can only realistically happen on 32 bit architectures with large
file support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That key size is taken from proposal 224 thus specified in the protocol.
Closes #20569
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because <unset> makes more sense than AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA...
(I have indeed verified that ed25519_fmt() is only used for
logging. This patch also clarifies the intention that ed25519_fmt()
is only for logging.
Closes ticket 21037.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Give size_mul_check() external linkage and use it in base64_decode() to
avoid a potential integer wrap.
Closes #19222
|
|
|
|
This came up on #21035, where somebody tried to build on a linux
system with kernel headers including CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE, then
run on a kernel that didn't support it.
I've adopted a belt-and-suspenders approach here: we detect failures
at initialization time, and we also detect (loudly) failures later on.
Fixes bug 21035; bugfix on 0.2.9.1-alpha when we started using
monotonic time.
|
|
|
|
I got confused when I saw my Tor saying it was opening a file
that doesn't exist. It turns out it isn't opening it, it's just
calling open() on it and then moving on when it's not there.
|
|
This reverts commit 954eeda619a59dae76144ad69967f0ed7341b564.
Apparently, OpenBSD is what expects you to declare environ
yourself. So 19142 is a wontfix.
|
|
|
|
This includes:
* making bridge_info_t exposed but opaque
* allowing guards where we don't know an identity
* making it possible to learn the identity of a guard
* creating a guard that lacks a node_t
* remembering a guard's address and port.
* Looking up a guard by address and port.
* Only enforcing the rule that we need a live consensus to update
the "listed" status for guards when we are not using bridges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Test for both v2 and v3 ESTABLISH_INTRO handling.
|
|
|
|
There seems to be pretty good evidence that it's always declared,
and that checking for it is pointless.
Closes ticket 19142.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
