| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
They are about to be shutdown in September.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes #40061
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
(In order to avoid conflicts, I'm applying this script separately to
each maint branch. This is the 0.4.3 version.)
|
|
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
|
|
This change broke torsocks that by default is expecting an IPv4 for hostname
resolution because it can't ask tor for a specific IP version with the SOCKS5
extension.
PreferIPv6 made it that sometimes the IPv6 could be returned to torsocks that
was expecting an IPv4.
Torsocks is probably a very unique case because the runtime flow is that it
hijacks DNS resolution (ex: getaddrinfo()), gets an IP and then sends it back
for the connect() to happen.
The libc has DNS resolution functions that allows the caller to request a
specific INET family but torsocks can't tell tor to resolve the hostname only
to an IPv4 or IPv6 and thus by default fallsback to IPv4.
Reverting this change into 0.4.3.x series but we'll keep it in the 0.4.4.x
series in the hope that we add this SOCKS5 extension to tor for DNS resolution
and then change torsocks to use that.
Fixes #33804
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
Merge static function declaration deletions from bug32588_042 and
maint-0.4.3 in app/config/config.c.
|
|
|
|
Merge tests from maint-0.4.1 with new tests from bug32588_035
in test_router.c.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes #33361
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
This patch ensures that we always lowercase the BridgeDistribution from
torrc in descriptors before submitting it.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/32753
|
|
This controls the previous feature added that makes dirauth send back a 503
error code on non relay connections if under bandwidth pressure.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
|
|
|
Make Tor clients tell dual-stack exits that they prefer IPv6
connections.
This change is equivalent to setting the PreferIPv6 flag on
SOCKSPorts (and most other listener ports). Tor Browser has
been setting this flag for some time, and we want to remove a
client distinguisher at exits.
Also update the man page, putting all the IP flags in their
non-default forms.
Closes ticket 32637.
|
|
Fixes bug 32778; bugfix on 0.4.1.1-alpha.
|
|
This reverts commit 5c240db0bf7751d74ba438a1ca4ef0d051a53df7.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolved conflicts in src/core/include.am
|
|
|
|
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
directory_must_use_begindir dirclient_must_use_begindir \
directory_fetches_from_authorities dirclient_fetches_from_authorities \
directory_fetches_dir_info_early dirclient_fetches_dir_info_early \
directory_fetches_dir_info_later dirclient_fetches_dir_info_later \
directory_too_idle_to_fetch_descriptors dirclient_too_idle_to_fetch_descriptors
|
|
I had incorrectly identified these functions as dircache-only, when
in fact they apply to everyone who acts a directory client.
|
|
|
|
When we made these functions exist unconditionally (as macros on
non-windows platforms), we started to get a dead-code warning on
Coverity. We now use a macro to tell coverity not to worry about
this particular dead-code instance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes ticket 32137.
|
|
|
|
This frees us from some dependencies on include order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This lets us simplify main.c a little, and avoid a practracker
exception.
Followup from #32883.
|
|
Followup for #32883.
|
|
Fixes bug 32778; bugfix on 0.4.1.1-alpha.
|
|
These changes were created using the "make autostyle" from
32522, and then split into commits.
|
|
We stopped looking at this option in 85cf6dcba3693b, back when we
implemented the minimal pieces of prop275. Since then, we've had
code to validate and adjust this option, and to give it a different
value in testing networks, but the option hasn't actually done
anything.
We can safely mark it as OBSOLETE, since doing so does not make any
old configuration get rejected.
Closes ticket 32807.
|
|
|
|
|
