| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Fix for bug 3296.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We were doing an O(n) strlen in router_get_extrainfo_hash() for
every one we tried to parse. Instead, have
router_get_extrainfo_hash() take the length of the extrainfo as an
argument, so that when it's called from
extrainfo_parse_from_string(), it doesn't do a strlen() over the
whole pile of extrainfos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
src/common/util.c
src/test/test_util.c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix #5760
|
|
Now that the pt code logs mp->argv[0] all over the place, we need to
be sure to set up mp->argv in our tests.
Bugfix on e603692adcd, not in any released version.
|
|
If the authorities agreed on a sufficiently bad bwweightscale value
(<=0 or == INT32_MAX), the bandwidth algorithm could make the voters
assert while computing the consensus.
Fix for bug5786; bugfix on 0.2.2.17-alpha
|
|
See changes file for details.
Partial fix for bug 5786; fix on 0.2.2.2-alpha.
|
|
The underlying strtoX functions handle overflow by saturating and
setting errno to ERANGE. If the min/max arguments to the
tor_parse_* functions are equal to the minimum/maximum of the
underlying type, then with the old approach, we wouldn't treat a
too-large value as genuinely broken.
Found this while looking at bug 5786; bugfix on 19da1f36 (in Tor
0.0.9), which introduced these functions.
|
|
(Note: It makes sense to use tor-gencert on Windows for testing
purposes only. If you are a directory authority operator, and you
are contemplating running tor-gencert on a Windows box in an actual
production environment, you are probably making a mistake.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i assume if nickm maintained "libeven" this would never have been
introduced. :)
|
|
We had been checking for EINVAL, but that means that SOCK_* isn't
supported, not that the syscall itself is missing.
Bugfix on 0.2.3.1-alpha, which started to use accept4.
|
|
This is how IPv6 says "0.0.0.0" and something we will have to
translate into a globally reachable address before putting it in a
descriptor.
The fix is a short term solution until a real one is implemented.
Closes #5146.
|
|
|
|
Fix for bug 5723; bugfix on 0.2.3.1-alpha (commit 22f723e4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think that the trailing __ got added in false analogy to
HAVE_MACRO__func__, HAVE_MACRO__FUNC__, and HAVE_MACRO__FUNCTION__.
But those macros actually indicate the presence of __func__,
__FUNC__, and __FUNCTION__ respectively. The __ at the end of
HAVE_EXTERN_ENVIRON_DECLARED would only be appropriate if the
environ were declared__, whatever that means.
(As a side-note, HAVE_MACRO__func__ and so on should probably be
renamed HAVE_MACRO___func__ and so on. But that can wait.)
This is an identifier renaming only.
|
|
We'd had our configure.in test include unistd.h unconditionally,
which would fail on Windows/mingw, even though environ _was_
declared there. Fix for 5704; bugfix on 0.2.3.13-alpha.
Thanks to Erinn for finding this and rransom for figuring out the
problem.
|
|
If the client uses a v2 cipherlist on the renegotiation handshake,
it looks as if they could fail to get a good cert chain from the
server, since they server would re-disable certificate chaining.
This patch makes it so the code that make the server side of the
first v2 handshake special can get called only once.
Fix for 4591; bugfix on 0.2.0.20-rc.
|
|
They boil down to:
- MS_WINDOWS is dead and replaced with _WIN32, but we let a few
instances creep in when we merged Esteban's tests.
- Capitalizing windows header names confuses mingw.
- #ifdef 0 ain't C.
- One unit test wasn't compiled on windows, but was being listed
anyway.
- One unit test was checking for the wrong value.
Gisle Vanem found and fixed the latter 3 issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes bug #4528 "read_to_buf_tls(): Inconsistency in code".
This check was added back in 0.1.0.3-rc, but somehow we forgot to
leave it in when we refactored read_to_buf_tls in 0.1.0.5-rc.
(patch by Arturo; commit message and changes file by nickm)
|
|
fixes bug 5623.
|
|
|
|
Instead of checking for 'rejected' and calling everything else okay,
let's check for 'outdated' and call everythign else a problem. This
way we don't risk missing future errors so much.
When logging a message that _looks_ like an error message at info, we
should mention that it isn't really a problem.
|
