aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test/test_shared_random.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/test_shared_random.c')
-rw-r--r--src/test/test_shared_random.c455
1 files changed, 278 insertions, 177 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/test_shared_random.c b/src/test/test_shared_random.c
index 526fb09b67..630883e1fb 100644
--- a/src/test/test_shared_random.c
+++ b/src/test/test_shared_random.c
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+/* Copyright (c) 2016-2017, The Tor Project, Inc. */
+/* See LICENSE for licensing information */
+
#define SHARED_RANDOM_PRIVATE
#define SHARED_RANDOM_STATE_PRIVATE
#define CONFIG_PRIVATE
@@ -6,15 +9,18 @@
#include "or.h"
#include "test.h"
#include "config.h"
-#include "dirvote.h"
-#include "shared_random.h"
-#include "shared_random_state.h"
+#include "crypto_rand.h"
+#include "dirauth/dirvote.h"
+#include "dirauth/shared_random.h"
+#include "dirauth/shared_random_state.h"
+#include "log_test_helpers.h"
+#include "networkstatus.h"
+#include "router.h"
#include "routerkeys.h"
#include "routerlist.h"
-#include "router.h"
#include "routerparse.h"
-#include "networkstatus.h"
-#include "log_test_helpers.h"
+#include "shared_random_client.h"
+#include "voting_schedule.h"
static authority_cert_t *mock_cert;
@@ -48,7 +54,7 @@ init_authority_state(void)
mock_cert = authority_cert_parse_from_string(AUTHORITY_CERT_1, NULL);
tt_assert(mock_cert);
options->AuthoritativeDir = 1;
- tt_int_op(0, ==, load_ed_keys(options, time(NULL)));
+ tt_int_op(load_ed_keys(options, time(NULL)), OP_GE, 0);
sr_state_init(0, 0);
/* It's possible a commit has been generated in our state depending on
* the phase we are currently in which uses "now" as the starting
@@ -76,65 +82,73 @@ test_get_sr_protocol_phase(void *arg)
{
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 20 Apr 2015 23:59:00 UTC", &the_time);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
phase = get_sr_protocol_phase(the_time);
- tt_int_op(phase, ==, SR_PHASE_REVEAL);
+ tt_int_op(phase, OP_EQ, SR_PHASE_REVEAL);
}
{
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 UTC", &the_time);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
phase = get_sr_protocol_phase(the_time);
- tt_int_op(phase, ==, SR_PHASE_COMMIT);
+ tt_int_op(phase, OP_EQ, SR_PHASE_COMMIT);
}
{
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:01 UTC", &the_time);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
phase = get_sr_protocol_phase(the_time);
- tt_int_op(phase, ==, SR_PHASE_COMMIT);
+ tt_int_op(phase, OP_EQ, SR_PHASE_COMMIT);
}
{
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 20 Apr 2015 11:59:00 UTC", &the_time);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
phase = get_sr_protocol_phase(the_time);
- tt_int_op(phase, ==, SR_PHASE_COMMIT);
+ tt_int_op(phase, OP_EQ, SR_PHASE_COMMIT);
}
{
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 20 Apr 2015 12:00:00 UTC", &the_time);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
phase = get_sr_protocol_phase(the_time);
- tt_int_op(phase, ==, SR_PHASE_REVEAL);
+ tt_int_op(phase, OP_EQ, SR_PHASE_REVEAL);
}
{
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 20 Apr 2015 12:00:01 UTC", &the_time);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
phase = get_sr_protocol_phase(the_time);
- tt_int_op(phase, ==, SR_PHASE_REVEAL);
+ tt_int_op(phase, OP_EQ, SR_PHASE_REVEAL);
}
{
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 20 Apr 2015 13:00:00 UTC", &the_time);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
phase = get_sr_protocol_phase(the_time);
- tt_int_op(phase, ==, SR_PHASE_REVEAL);
+ tt_int_op(phase, OP_EQ, SR_PHASE_REVEAL);
}
done:
;
}
-static networkstatus_t *mock_consensus = NULL;
+static networkstatus_t mock_consensus;
+
+/* Mock function to immediately return our local 'mock_consensus'. */
+static networkstatus_t *
+mock_networkstatus_get_live_consensus(time_t now)
+{
+ (void) now;
+ return &mock_consensus;
+}
static void
test_get_state_valid_until_time(void *arg)
@@ -146,11 +160,23 @@ test_get_state_valid_until_time(void *arg)
(void) arg;
+ MOCK(networkstatus_get_live_consensus,
+ mock_networkstatus_get_live_consensus);
+
+ retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:00:00 UTC",
+ &mock_consensus.fresh_until);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
+
+ retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 UTC",
+ &mock_consensus.valid_after);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
+
{
/* Get the valid until time if called at 00:00:01 */
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:01 UTC",
&current_time);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
+ voting_schedule_recalculate_timing(get_options(), current_time);
valid_until_time = get_state_valid_until_time(current_time);
/* Compare it with the correct result */
@@ -161,7 +187,8 @@ test_get_state_valid_until_time(void *arg)
{
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:22:00 UTC",
&current_time);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
+ voting_schedule_recalculate_timing(get_options(), current_time);
valid_until_time = get_state_valid_until_time(current_time);
format_iso_time(tbuf, valid_until_time);
@@ -171,7 +198,8 @@ test_get_state_valid_until_time(void *arg)
{
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 23:59:00 UTC",
&current_time);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
+ voting_schedule_recalculate_timing(get_options(), current_time);
valid_until_time = get_state_valid_until_time(current_time);
format_iso_time(tbuf, valid_until_time);
@@ -181,7 +209,8 @@ test_get_state_valid_until_time(void *arg)
{
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 UTC",
&current_time);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
+ voting_schedule_recalculate_timing(get_options(), current_time);
valid_until_time = get_state_valid_until_time(current_time);
format_iso_time(tbuf, valid_until_time);
@@ -189,82 +218,148 @@ test_get_state_valid_until_time(void *arg)
}
done:
- ;
+ UNMOCK(networkstatus_get_live_consensus);
}
-/* Mock function to immediately return our local 'mock_consensus'. */
-static networkstatus_t *
-mock_networkstatus_get_live_consensus(time_t now)
-{
- (void) now;
- return mock_consensus;
-}
-
-/** Test the get_next_valid_after_time() function. */
+/** Test the function that calculates the start time of the current SRV
+ * protocol run. */
static void
-test_get_next_valid_after_time(void *arg)
+test_get_start_time_of_current_run(void *arg)
{
- time_t current_time;
- time_t valid_after_time;
- char tbuf[ISO_TIME_LEN + 1];
int retval;
+ char tbuf[ISO_TIME_LEN + 1];
+ time_t current_time, run_start_time;
(void) arg;
- {
- /* Setup a fake consensus just to get the times out of it, since
- get_next_valid_after_time() needs them. */
- mock_consensus = tor_malloc_zero(sizeof(networkstatus_t));
+ MOCK(networkstatus_get_live_consensus,
+ mock_networkstatus_get_live_consensus);
- retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 13 Jan 2016 16:00:00 UTC",
- &mock_consensus->fresh_until);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
+ retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:00:00 UTC",
+ &mock_consensus.fresh_until);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
- retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 13 Jan 2016 15:00:00 UTC",
- &mock_consensus->valid_after);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
+ retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 UTC",
+ &mock_consensus.valid_after);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
- MOCK(networkstatus_get_live_consensus,
- mock_networkstatus_get_live_consensus);
+ {
+ /* Get start time if called at 00:00:01 */
+ retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:01 UTC",
+ &current_time);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
+ voting_schedule_recalculate_timing(get_options(), current_time);
+ run_start_time =
+ sr_state_get_start_time_of_current_protocol_run(current_time);
+
+ /* Compare it with the correct result */
+ format_iso_time(tbuf, run_start_time);
+ tt_str_op("2015-04-20 00:00:00", OP_EQ, tbuf);
}
{
- /* Get the valid after time if called at 00:00:00 */
- retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 UTC",
+ retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 23:59:59 UTC",
&current_time);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
- valid_after_time = get_next_valid_after_time(current_time);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
+ voting_schedule_recalculate_timing(get_options(), current_time);
+ run_start_time =
+ sr_state_get_start_time_of_current_protocol_run(current_time);
/* Compare it with the correct result */
- format_iso_time(tbuf, valid_after_time);
- tt_str_op("2015-04-20 01:00:00", OP_EQ, tbuf);
+ format_iso_time(tbuf, run_start_time);
+ tt_str_op("2015-04-20 00:00:00", OP_EQ, tbuf);
}
{
- /* Get the valid until time if called at 00:00:01 */
- retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:01 UTC",
+ retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 UTC",
&current_time);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
- valid_after_time = get_next_valid_after_time(current_time);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
+ voting_schedule_recalculate_timing(get_options(), current_time);
+ run_start_time =
+ sr_state_get_start_time_of_current_protocol_run(current_time);
/* Compare it with the correct result */
- format_iso_time(tbuf, valid_after_time);
- tt_str_op("2015-04-20 01:00:00", OP_EQ, tbuf);
- }
+ format_iso_time(tbuf, run_start_time);
+ tt_str_op("2015-04-20 00:00:00", OP_EQ, tbuf);
+ }
+
+ /* Next test is testing it without a consensus to use the testing voting
+ * interval . */
+ UNMOCK(networkstatus_get_live_consensus);
+ /* Now let's alter the voting schedule and check the correctness of the
+ * function. Voting interval of 10 seconds, means that an SRV protocol run
+ * takes 10 seconds * 24 rounds = 4 mins */
{
- retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 23:30:01 UTC",
+ or_options_t *options = get_options_mutable();
+ options->V3AuthVotingInterval = 10;
+ options->TestingV3AuthInitialVotingInterval = 10;
+ retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:15:32 UTC",
&current_time);
- tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
- valid_after_time = get_next_valid_after_time(current_time);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
+ voting_schedule_recalculate_timing(get_options(), current_time);
+ run_start_time =
+ sr_state_get_start_time_of_current_protocol_run(current_time);
/* Compare it with the correct result */
- format_iso_time(tbuf, valid_after_time);
- tt_str_op("2015-04-21 00:00:00", OP_EQ, tbuf);
- }
+ format_iso_time(tbuf, run_start_time);
+ tt_str_op("2015-04-20 00:12:00", OP_EQ, tbuf);
+ }
done:
- networkstatus_vote_free(mock_consensus);
+ ;
+}
+
+/** Do some rudimentary consistency checks between the functions that
+ * understand the shared random protocol schedule */
+static void
+test_get_start_time_functions(void *arg)
+{
+ (void) arg;
+ int retval;
+
+ MOCK(networkstatus_get_live_consensus,
+ mock_networkstatus_get_live_consensus);
+
+ retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:00:00 UTC",
+ &mock_consensus.fresh_until);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
+
+ retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 UTC",
+ &mock_consensus.valid_after);
+ tt_int_op(retval, OP_EQ, 0);
+ time_t now = mock_consensus.valid_after;
+
+ voting_schedule_recalculate_timing(get_options(), now);
+ time_t start_time_of_protocol_run =
+ sr_state_get_start_time_of_current_protocol_run(now);
+ tt_assert(start_time_of_protocol_run);
+
+ /* Check that the round start time of the beginning of the run, is itself */
+ tt_int_op(get_start_time_of_current_round(), OP_EQ,
+ start_time_of_protocol_run);
+
+ done:
+ UNMOCK(networkstatus_get_live_consensus);
+}
+
+static void
+test_get_sr_protocol_duration(void *arg)
+{
+ (void) arg;
+
+ /* Check that by default an SR phase is 12 hours */
+ tt_int_op(sr_state_get_phase_duration(), OP_EQ, 12*60*60);
+ tt_int_op(sr_state_get_protocol_run_duration(), OP_EQ, 24*60*60);
+
+ /* Now alter the voting interval and check that the SR phase is 2 mins long
+ * if voting happens every 10 seconds (10*12 seconds = 2 mins) */
+ or_options_t *options = get_options_mutable();
+ options->V3AuthVotingInterval = 10;
+ tt_int_op(sr_state_get_phase_duration(), OP_EQ, 2*60);
+ tt_int_op(sr_state_get_protocol_run_duration(), OP_EQ, 4*60);
+
+ done: ;
}
/* In this test we are going to generate a sr_commit_t object and validate
@@ -289,7 +384,7 @@ test_sr_commit(void *arg)
tt_assert(auth_cert);
options->AuthoritativeDir = 1;
- tt_int_op(0, ==, load_ed_keys(options, now));
+ tt_int_op(load_ed_keys(options, time(NULL)), OP_GE, 0);
}
/* Generate our commit object and validate it has the appropriate field
@@ -307,18 +402,18 @@ test_sr_commit(void *arg)
tt_assert(!tor_mem_is_zero((char *) our_commit->random_number,
sizeof(our_commit->random_number)));
/* Commit and reveal timestamp should be the same. */
- tt_u64_op(our_commit->commit_ts, ==, our_commit->reveal_ts);
+ tt_u64_op(our_commit->commit_ts, OP_EQ, our_commit->reveal_ts);
/* We should have a hashed reveal. */
tt_assert(!tor_mem_is_zero(our_commit->hashed_reveal,
sizeof(our_commit->hashed_reveal)));
/* Do we have a valid encoded commit and reveal. Note the following only
* tests if the generated values are correct. Their could be a bug in
- * the decode function but we test them seperately. */
- tt_int_op(0, ==, reveal_decode(our_commit->encoded_reveal,
+ * the decode function but we test them separately. */
+ tt_int_op(0, OP_EQ, reveal_decode(our_commit->encoded_reveal,
&test_commit));
- tt_int_op(0, ==, commit_decode(our_commit->encoded_commit,
+ tt_int_op(0, OP_EQ, commit_decode(our_commit->encoded_commit,
&test_commit));
- tt_int_op(0, ==, verify_commit_and_reveal(our_commit));
+ tt_int_op(0, OP_EQ, verify_commit_and_reveal(our_commit));
}
/* Let's make sure our verify commit and reveal function works. We'll
@@ -331,32 +426,32 @@ test_sr_commit(void *arg)
/* Timestamp MUST match. */
test_commit.commit_ts = test_commit.reveal_ts - 42;
setup_full_capture_of_logs(LOG_WARN);
- tt_int_op(-1, ==, verify_commit_and_reveal(&test_commit));
+ tt_int_op(-1, OP_EQ, verify_commit_and_reveal(&test_commit));
expect_log_msg_containing("doesn't match reveal timestamp");
teardown_capture_of_logs();
memcpy(&test_commit, our_commit, sizeof(test_commit));
- tt_int_op(0, ==, verify_commit_and_reveal(&test_commit));
+ tt_int_op(0, OP_EQ, verify_commit_and_reveal(&test_commit));
/* Hashed reveal must match the H(encoded_reveal). */
memset(test_commit.hashed_reveal, 'X',
sizeof(test_commit.hashed_reveal));
setup_full_capture_of_logs(LOG_WARN);
- tt_int_op(-1, ==, verify_commit_and_reveal(&test_commit));
+ tt_int_op(-1, OP_EQ, verify_commit_and_reveal(&test_commit));
expect_single_log_msg_containing("doesn't match the commit value");
teardown_capture_of_logs();
memcpy(&test_commit, our_commit, sizeof(test_commit));
- tt_int_op(0, ==, verify_commit_and_reveal(&test_commit));
+ tt_int_op(0, OP_EQ, verify_commit_and_reveal(&test_commit));
}
/* We'll build a list of values from our commit that our parsing function
* takes from a vote line and see if we can parse it correctly. */
{
- smartlist_add(args, tor_strdup("1"));
- smartlist_add(args,
- tor_strdup(crypto_digest_algorithm_get_name(our_commit->alg)));
- smartlist_add(args, tor_strdup(sr_commit_get_rsa_fpr(our_commit)));
- smartlist_add(args, tor_strdup(our_commit->encoded_commit));
- smartlist_add(args, tor_strdup(our_commit->encoded_reveal));
+ smartlist_add_strdup(args, "1");
+ smartlist_add_strdup(args,
+ crypto_digest_algorithm_get_name(our_commit->alg));
+ smartlist_add_strdup(args, sr_commit_get_rsa_fpr(our_commit));
+ smartlist_add_strdup(args, our_commit->encoded_commit);
+ smartlist_add_strdup(args, our_commit->encoded_reveal);
parsed_commit = sr_parse_commit(args);
tt_assert(parsed_commit);
/* That parsed commit should be _EXACTLY_ like our original commit (we
@@ -399,26 +494,26 @@ test_encoding(void *arg)
/* Hash random number because we don't expose bytes of the RNG. */
ret = crypto_digest256(hashed_rand, raw_rand,
sizeof(raw_rand), SR_DIGEST_ALG);
- tt_int_op(0, ==, ret);
+ tt_int_op(0, OP_EQ, ret);
/* Hash reveal value. */
- tt_int_op(SR_REVEAL_BASE64_LEN, ==, strlen(encoded_reveal));
+ tt_int_op(SR_REVEAL_BASE64_LEN, OP_EQ, strlen(encoded_reveal));
ret = crypto_digest256(hashed_reveal, encoded_reveal,
strlen(encoded_reveal), SR_DIGEST_ALG);
- tt_int_op(0, ==, ret);
- tt_int_op(SR_COMMIT_BASE64_LEN, ==, strlen(encoded_commit));
+ tt_int_op(0, OP_EQ, ret);
+ tt_int_op(SR_COMMIT_BASE64_LEN, OP_EQ, strlen(encoded_commit));
/* Test our commit/reveal decode functions. */
{
/* Test the reveal encoded value. */
- tt_int_op(0, ==, reveal_decode(encoded_reveal, &parsed_commit));
- tt_u64_op(ts, ==, parsed_commit.reveal_ts);
+ tt_int_op(0, OP_EQ, reveal_decode(encoded_reveal, &parsed_commit));
+ tt_u64_op(ts, OP_EQ, parsed_commit.reveal_ts);
tt_mem_op(hashed_rand, OP_EQ, parsed_commit.random_number,
sizeof(hashed_rand));
/* Test the commit encoded value. */
memset(&parsed_commit, 0, sizeof(parsed_commit));
- tt_int_op(0, ==, commit_decode(encoded_commit, &parsed_commit));
- tt_u64_op(ts, ==, parsed_commit.commit_ts);
+ tt_int_op(0, OP_EQ, commit_decode(encoded_commit, &parsed_commit));
+ tt_u64_op(ts, OP_EQ, parsed_commit.commit_ts);
tt_mem_op(encoded_commit, OP_EQ, parsed_commit.encoded_commit,
sizeof(parsed_commit.encoded_commit));
tt_mem_op(hashed_reveal, OP_EQ, parsed_commit.hashed_reveal,
@@ -433,7 +528,7 @@ test_encoding(void *arg)
memcpy(parsed_commit.random_number, hashed_rand,
sizeof(parsed_commit.random_number));
ret = reveal_encode(&parsed_commit, encoded, sizeof(encoded));
- tt_int_op(SR_REVEAL_BASE64_LEN, ==, ret);
+ tt_int_op(SR_REVEAL_BASE64_LEN, OP_EQ, ret);
tt_mem_op(encoded_reveal, OP_EQ, encoded, strlen(encoded_reveal));
}
@@ -444,7 +539,7 @@ test_encoding(void *arg)
memcpy(parsed_commit.hashed_reveal, hashed_reveal,
sizeof(parsed_commit.hashed_reveal));
ret = commit_encode(&parsed_commit, encoded, sizeof(encoded));
- tt_int_op(SR_COMMIT_BASE64_LEN, ==, ret);
+ tt_int_op(SR_COMMIT_BASE64_LEN, OP_EQ, ret);
tt_mem_op(encoded_commit, OP_EQ, encoded, strlen(encoded_commit));
}
@@ -456,7 +551,7 @@ test_encoding(void *arg)
* If <b>also_current</b> is set, then set both current and previous SRVs.
* Otherwise, just set the previous SRV. (And clear the current SRV.)
*
- * You must call sr_state_free() to free the state at the end of each test
+ * You must call sr_state_free_all() to free the state at the end of each test
* function (on pass or fail). */
static void
test_sr_setup_srv(int also_current)
@@ -529,9 +624,9 @@ test_vote(void *arg)
tt_assert(lines);
/* Split the lines. We expect 2 here. */
ret = smartlist_split_string(chunks, lines, "\n", SPLIT_IGNORE_BLANK, 0);
- tt_int_op(ret, ==, 4);
+ tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, 4);
tt_str_op(smartlist_get(chunks, 0), OP_EQ, "shared-rand-participate");
- /* Get our commitment line and will validate it agains our commit. The
+ /* Get our commitment line and will validate it against our commit. The
* format is as follow:
* "shared-rand-commitment" SP version SP algname SP identity
* SP COMMIT [SP REVEAL] NL
@@ -539,7 +634,7 @@ test_vote(void *arg)
char *commit_line = smartlist_get(chunks, 1);
tt_assert(commit_line);
ret = smartlist_split_string(tokens, commit_line, " ", 0, 0);
- tt_int_op(ret, ==, 6);
+ tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, 6);
tt_str_op(smartlist_get(tokens, 0), OP_EQ, "shared-rand-commit");
tt_str_op(smartlist_get(tokens, 1), OP_EQ, "1");
tt_str_op(smartlist_get(tokens, 2), OP_EQ,
@@ -547,7 +642,7 @@ test_vote(void *arg)
char digest[DIGEST_LEN];
base16_decode(digest, sizeof(digest), smartlist_get(tokens, 3),
HEX_DIGEST_LEN);
- tt_mem_op(digest, ==, our_commit->rsa_identity, sizeof(digest));
+ tt_mem_op(digest, OP_EQ, our_commit->rsa_identity, sizeof(digest));
tt_str_op(smartlist_get(tokens, 4), OP_EQ, our_commit->encoded_commit);
tt_str_op(smartlist_get(tokens, 5), OP_EQ, our_commit->encoded_reveal)
;
@@ -563,7 +658,7 @@ test_vote(void *arg)
/* Set valid flag explicitly here to compare since it's not set by
* simply parsing the commit. */
parsed_commit->valid = 1;
- tt_mem_op(parsed_commit, ==, our_commit, sizeof(*our_commit));
+ tt_mem_op(parsed_commit, OP_EQ, our_commit, sizeof(*our_commit));
/* minor cleanup */
SMARTLIST_FOREACH(tokens, char *, s, tor_free(s));
@@ -573,7 +668,7 @@ test_vote(void *arg)
char *prev_srv_line = smartlist_get(chunks, 2);
tt_assert(prev_srv_line);
ret = smartlist_split_string(tokens, prev_srv_line, " ", 0, 0);
- tt_int_op(ret, ==, 3);
+ tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, 3);
tt_str_op(smartlist_get(tokens, 0), OP_EQ, "shared-rand-previous-value");
tt_str_op(smartlist_get(tokens, 1), OP_EQ, "42");
tt_str_op(smartlist_get(tokens, 2), OP_EQ,
@@ -587,7 +682,7 @@ test_vote(void *arg)
char *current_srv_line = smartlist_get(chunks, 3);
tt_assert(current_srv_line);
ret = smartlist_split_string(tokens, current_srv_line, " ", 0, 0);
- tt_int_op(ret, ==, 3);
+ tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, 3);
tt_str_op(smartlist_get(tokens, 0), OP_EQ, "shared-rand-current-value");
tt_str_op(smartlist_get(tokens, 1), OP_EQ, "128");
tt_str_op(smartlist_get(tokens, 2), OP_EQ,
@@ -606,7 +701,7 @@ test_vote(void *arg)
done:
UNMOCK(trusteddirserver_get_by_v3_auth_digest);
- sr_state_free();
+ sr_state_free_all();
}
static const char *sr_state_str = "Version 1\n"
@@ -640,7 +735,7 @@ test_state_load_from_disk(void *arg)
/* First try with a nonexistent path. */
ret = disk_state_load_from_disk_impl("NONEXISTENTNONEXISTENT");
- tt_assert(ret == -ENOENT);
+ tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, -ENOENT);
/* Now create a mock state directory and state file */
#ifdef _WIN32
@@ -648,9 +743,9 @@ test_state_load_from_disk(void *arg)
#else
ret = mkdir(dir, 0700);
#endif
- tt_assert(ret == 0);
+ tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, 0);
ret = write_str_to_file(sr_state_path, sr_state_str, 0);
- tt_assert(ret == 0);
+ tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, 0);
/* Try to load the directory itself. Should fail. */
ret = disk_state_load_from_disk_impl(dir);
@@ -658,11 +753,11 @@ test_state_load_from_disk(void *arg)
/* State should be non-existent at this point. */
the_sr_state = get_sr_state();
- tt_assert(!the_sr_state);
+ tt_ptr_op(the_sr_state, OP_EQ, NULL);
/* Now try to load the correct file! */
ret = disk_state_load_from_disk_impl(sr_state_path);
- tt_assert(ret == 0);
+ tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, 0);
/* Check the content of the state */
/* XXX check more deeply!!! */
@@ -700,7 +795,7 @@ test_sr_setup_commits(void)
tt_assert(auth_cert);
options->AuthoritativeDir = 1;
- tt_int_op(0, ==, load_ed_keys(options, now));
+ tt_int_op(0, OP_EQ, load_ed_keys(options, now));
}
/* Generate three dummy commits according to sr_srv_calc_ref.py . Then
@@ -786,7 +881,7 @@ test_sr_setup_commits(void)
save_commit_to_state(commit_b);
save_commit_to_state(commit_c);
save_commit_to_state(commit_d);
- tt_int_op(digestmap_size(get_sr_state()->commits), ==, 4);
+ tt_int_op(digestmap_size(get_sr_state()->commits), OP_EQ, 4);
/* Now during REVEAL phase save commit D by restoring its reveal. */
set_sr_phase(SR_PHASE_REVEAL);
@@ -833,14 +928,14 @@ test_sr_compute_srv(void *arg)
/* Check the result against the test vector */
current_srv = sr_state_get_current_srv();
tt_assert(current_srv);
- tt_u64_op(current_srv->num_reveals, ==, 3);
+ tt_u64_op(current_srv->num_reveals, OP_EQ, 3);
tt_str_op(hex_str((char*)current_srv->value, 32),
- ==,
+ OP_EQ,
SRV_TEST_VECTOR);
done:
UNMOCK(trusteddirserver_get_by_v3_auth_digest);
- sr_state_free();
+ sr_state_free_all();
}
/** Return a minimal vote document with a current SRV value set to
@@ -892,7 +987,7 @@ test_sr_get_majority_srv_from_votes(void *arg)
/* Since it's only one vote with an SRV, it should not achieve majority and
hence no SRV will be returned. */
chosen_srv = get_majority_srv_from_votes(votes, 1);
- tt_assert(!chosen_srv);
+ tt_ptr_op(chosen_srv, OP_EQ, NULL);
{ /* Now put in 8 more votes. Let SRV_1 have majority. */
int i;
@@ -911,21 +1006,21 @@ test_sr_get_majority_srv_from_votes(void *arg)
smartlist_add(votes, vote);
}
- tt_int_op(smartlist_len(votes), ==, 9);
+ tt_int_op(smartlist_len(votes), OP_EQ, 9);
}
/* Now we achieve majority for SRV_1, but not the AuthDirNumSRVAgreements
requirement. So still not picking an SRV. */
set_num_srv_agreements(8);
chosen_srv = get_majority_srv_from_votes(votes, 1);
- tt_assert(!chosen_srv);
+ tt_ptr_op(chosen_srv, OP_EQ, NULL);
/* We will now lower the AuthDirNumSRVAgreements requirement by tweaking the
* consensus parameter and we will try again. This time it should work. */
set_num_srv_agreements(7);
chosen_srv = get_majority_srv_from_votes(votes, 1);
tt_assert(chosen_srv);
- tt_u64_op(chosen_srv->num_reveals, ==, 42);
+ tt_u64_op(chosen_srv->num_reveals, OP_EQ, 42);
tt_mem_op(chosen_srv->value, OP_EQ, SRV_1, sizeof(chosen_srv->value));
done:
@@ -949,7 +1044,7 @@ test_utils(void *arg)
memcpy(srv->value, srv_value, sizeof(srv->value));
dup_srv = srv_dup(srv);
tt_assert(dup_srv);
- tt_u64_op(dup_srv->num_reveals, ==, srv->num_reveals);
+ tt_u64_op(dup_srv->num_reveals, OP_EQ, srv->num_reveals);
tt_mem_op(dup_srv->value, OP_EQ, srv->value, sizeof(srv->value));
tor_free(srv);
tor_free(dup_srv);
@@ -969,10 +1064,10 @@ test_utils(void *arg)
sr_commit_t commit1, commit2;
memcpy(commit1.encoded_commit, payload, sizeof(commit1.encoded_commit));
memcpy(commit2.encoded_commit, payload, sizeof(commit2.encoded_commit));
- tt_int_op(commitments_are_the_same(&commit1, &commit2), ==, 1);
+ tt_int_op(commitments_are_the_same(&commit1, &commit2), OP_EQ, 1);
/* Let's corrupt one of them. */
memset(commit1.encoded_commit, 'A', sizeof(commit1.encoded_commit));
- tt_int_op(commitments_are_the_same(&commit1, &commit2), ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(commitments_are_the_same(&commit1, &commit2), OP_EQ, 0);
}
/* Testing commit_is_authoritative(). */
@@ -983,32 +1078,32 @@ test_utils(void *arg)
tt_assert(!crypto_pk_generate_key(k));
- tt_int_op(0, ==, crypto_pk_get_digest(k, digest));
+ tt_int_op(0, OP_EQ, crypto_pk_get_digest(k, digest));
memcpy(commit.rsa_identity, digest, sizeof(commit.rsa_identity));
- tt_int_op(commit_is_authoritative(&commit, digest), ==, 1);
+ tt_int_op(commit_is_authoritative(&commit, digest), OP_EQ, 1);
/* Change the pubkey. */
memset(commit.rsa_identity, 0, sizeof(commit.rsa_identity));
- tt_int_op(commit_is_authoritative(&commit, digest), ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(commit_is_authoritative(&commit, digest), OP_EQ, 0);
crypto_pk_free(k);
}
/* Testing get_phase_str(). */
{
- tt_str_op(get_phase_str(SR_PHASE_REVEAL), ==, "reveal");
- tt_str_op(get_phase_str(SR_PHASE_COMMIT), ==, "commit");
+ tt_str_op(get_phase_str(SR_PHASE_REVEAL), OP_EQ, "reveal");
+ tt_str_op(get_phase_str(SR_PHASE_COMMIT), OP_EQ, "commit");
}
/* Testing phase transition */
{
init_authority_state();
set_sr_phase(SR_PHASE_COMMIT);
- tt_int_op(is_phase_transition(SR_PHASE_REVEAL), ==, 1);
- tt_int_op(is_phase_transition(SR_PHASE_COMMIT), ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(is_phase_transition(SR_PHASE_REVEAL), OP_EQ, 1);
+ tt_int_op(is_phase_transition(SR_PHASE_COMMIT), OP_EQ, 0);
set_sr_phase(SR_PHASE_REVEAL);
- tt_int_op(is_phase_transition(SR_PHASE_REVEAL), ==, 0);
- tt_int_op(is_phase_transition(SR_PHASE_COMMIT), ==, 1);
+ tt_int_op(is_phase_transition(SR_PHASE_REVEAL), OP_EQ, 0);
+ tt_int_op(is_phase_transition(SR_PHASE_COMMIT), OP_EQ, 1);
/* Junk. */
- tt_int_op(is_phase_transition(42), ==, 1);
+ tt_int_op(is_phase_transition(42), OP_EQ, 1);
}
done:
@@ -1036,24 +1131,24 @@ test_state_transition(void *arg)
sr_commit_t *commit = sr_generate_our_commit(now, mock_cert);
tt_assert(commit);
sr_state_add_commit(commit);
- tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), ==, 1);
+ tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), OP_EQ, 1);
/* Let's test our delete feature. */
sr_state_delete_commits();
- tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), OP_EQ, 0);
/* Add it back so we can continue the rest of the test because after
* deletiong our commit will be freed so generate a new one. */
commit = sr_generate_our_commit(now, mock_cert);
tt_assert(commit);
sr_state_add_commit(commit);
- tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), ==, 1);
+ tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), OP_EQ, 1);
state->n_reveal_rounds = 42;
state->n_commit_rounds = 43;
state->n_protocol_runs = 44;
reset_state_for_new_protocol_run(now);
- tt_int_op(state->n_reveal_rounds, ==, 0);
- tt_int_op(state->n_commit_rounds, ==, 0);
- tt_u64_op(state->n_protocol_runs, ==, 45);
- tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(state->n_reveal_rounds, OP_EQ, 0);
+ tt_int_op(state->n_commit_rounds, OP_EQ, 0);
+ tt_u64_op(state->n_protocol_runs, OP_EQ, 45);
+ tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), OP_EQ, 0);
}
/* Test SRV rotation in our state. */
@@ -1066,7 +1161,7 @@ test_state_transition(void *arg)
state_rotate_srv();
prev = sr_state_get_previous_srv();
tt_assert(prev == cur);
- tt_assert(!sr_state_get_current_srv());
+ tt_ptr_op(sr_state_get_current_srv(), OP_EQ, NULL);
sr_state_clean_srvs();
}
@@ -1091,22 +1186,22 @@ test_state_transition(void *arg)
/* Also, make sure we did change the current. */
tt_assert(sr_state_get_current_srv() != cur);
/* We should have our commitment alone. */
- tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), ==, 1);
- tt_int_op(state->n_reveal_rounds, ==, 0);
- tt_int_op(state->n_commit_rounds, ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), OP_EQ, 1);
+ tt_int_op(state->n_reveal_rounds, OP_EQ, 0);
+ tt_int_op(state->n_commit_rounds, OP_EQ, 0);
/* 46 here since we were at 45 just before. */
- tt_u64_op(state->n_protocol_runs, ==, 46);
+ tt_u64_op(state->n_protocol_runs, OP_EQ, 46);
}
/* Cleanup of SRVs. */
{
sr_state_clean_srvs();
- tt_assert(!sr_state_get_current_srv());
- tt_assert(!sr_state_get_previous_srv());
+ tt_ptr_op(sr_state_get_current_srv(), OP_EQ, NULL);
+ tt_ptr_op(sr_state_get_previous_srv(), OP_EQ, NULL);
}
done:
- sr_state_free();
+ sr_state_free_all();
}
static void
@@ -1131,6 +1226,8 @@ test_keep_commit(void *arg)
state = get_sr_state();
}
+ crypto_rand((char*)fp, sizeof(fp));
+
/* Test this very important function that tells us if we should keep a
* commit or not in our state. Most of it depends on the phase and what's
* in the commit so we'll change the commit as we go. */
@@ -1139,21 +1236,21 @@ test_keep_commit(void *arg)
/* Set us in COMMIT phase for starter. */
set_sr_phase(SR_PHASE_COMMIT);
/* We should never keep a commit from a non authoritative authority. */
- tt_int_op(should_keep_commit(commit, fp, SR_PHASE_COMMIT), ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(should_keep_commit(commit, fp, SR_PHASE_COMMIT), OP_EQ, 0);
/* This should NOT be kept because it has a reveal value in it. */
tt_assert(commit_has_reveal_value(commit));
tt_int_op(should_keep_commit(commit, commit->rsa_identity,
- SR_PHASE_COMMIT), ==, 0);
+ SR_PHASE_COMMIT), OP_EQ, 0);
/* Add it to the state which should return to not keep it. */
sr_state_add_commit(commit);
tt_int_op(should_keep_commit(commit, commit->rsa_identity,
- SR_PHASE_COMMIT), ==, 0);
+ SR_PHASE_COMMIT), OP_EQ, 0);
/* Remove it from state so we can continue our testing. */
digestmap_remove(state->commits, commit->rsa_identity);
/* Let's remove our reveal value which should make it OK to keep it. */
memset(commit->encoded_reveal, 0, sizeof(commit->encoded_reveal));
tt_int_op(should_keep_commit(commit, commit->rsa_identity,
- SR_PHASE_COMMIT), ==, 1);
+ SR_PHASE_COMMIT), OP_EQ, 1);
/* Let's reset our commit and go into REVEAL phase. */
sr_commit_free(commit);
@@ -1165,17 +1262,17 @@ test_keep_commit(void *arg)
memset(dup_commit->encoded_reveal, 0, sizeof(dup_commit->encoded_reveal));
set_sr_phase(SR_PHASE_REVEAL);
/* We should never keep a commit from a non authoritative authority. */
- tt_int_op(should_keep_commit(commit, fp, SR_PHASE_REVEAL), ==, 0);
+ tt_int_op(should_keep_commit(commit, fp, SR_PHASE_REVEAL), OP_EQ, 0);
/* We shouldn't accept a commit that is not in our state. */
tt_int_op(should_keep_commit(commit, commit->rsa_identity,
- SR_PHASE_REVEAL), ==, 0);
+ SR_PHASE_REVEAL), OP_EQ, 0);
/* Important to add the commit _without_ the reveal here. */
sr_state_add_commit(dup_commit);
- tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), ==, 1);
+ tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), OP_EQ, 1);
/* Our commit should be valid that is authoritative, contains a reveal, be
* in the state and commitment and reveal values match. */
tt_int_op(should_keep_commit(commit, commit->rsa_identity,
- SR_PHASE_REVEAL), ==, 1);
+ SR_PHASE_REVEAL), OP_EQ, 1);
/* The commit shouldn't be kept if it's not verified that is no matchin
* hashed reveal. */
{
@@ -1186,7 +1283,7 @@ test_keep_commit(void *arg)
memset(commit->hashed_reveal, 0, sizeof(commit->hashed_reveal));
setup_full_capture_of_logs(LOG_WARN);
tt_int_op(should_keep_commit(commit, commit->rsa_identity,
- SR_PHASE_REVEAL), ==, 0);
+ SR_PHASE_REVEAL), OP_EQ, 0);
expect_log_msg_containing("doesn't match the commit value.");
expect_log_msg_containing("has an invalid reveal value.");
assert_log_predicate(mock_saved_log_n_entries() == 2,
@@ -1197,11 +1294,11 @@ test_keep_commit(void *arg)
}
/* We shouldn't keep a commit that has no reveal. */
tt_int_op(should_keep_commit(dup_commit, dup_commit->rsa_identity,
- SR_PHASE_REVEAL), ==, 0);
+ SR_PHASE_REVEAL), OP_EQ, 0);
/* We must not keep a commit that is not the same from the commit phase. */
memset(commit->encoded_commit, 0, sizeof(commit->encoded_commit));
tt_int_op(should_keep_commit(commit, commit->rsa_identity,
- SR_PHASE_REVEAL), ==, 0);
+ SR_PHASE_REVEAL), OP_EQ, 0);
done:
teardown_capture_of_logs();
@@ -1239,39 +1336,39 @@ test_state_update(void *arg)
/* We are in COMMIT phase here and we'll trigger a state update but no
* transition. */
sr_state_update(commit_phase_time);
- tt_int_op(state->valid_after, ==, commit_phase_time);
- tt_int_op(state->n_commit_rounds, ==, 1);
- tt_int_op(state->phase, ==, SR_PHASE_COMMIT);
- tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), ==, 1);
+ tt_int_op(state->valid_after, OP_EQ, commit_phase_time);
+ tt_int_op(state->n_commit_rounds, OP_EQ, 1);
+ tt_int_op(state->phase, OP_EQ, SR_PHASE_COMMIT);
+ tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), OP_EQ, 1);
/* We are still in the COMMIT phase here but we'll trigger a state
* transition to the REVEAL phase. */
sr_state_update(reveal_phase_time);
- tt_int_op(state->phase, ==, SR_PHASE_REVEAL);
- tt_int_op(state->valid_after, ==, reveal_phase_time);
+ tt_int_op(state->phase, OP_EQ, SR_PHASE_REVEAL);
+ tt_int_op(state->valid_after, OP_EQ, reveal_phase_time);
/* Only our commit should be in there. */
- tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), ==, 1);
- tt_int_op(state->n_reveal_rounds, ==, 1);
+ tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), OP_EQ, 1);
+ tt_int_op(state->n_reveal_rounds, OP_EQ, 1);
/* We can't update a state with a valid after _lower_ than the creation
* time so here it is. */
sr_state_update(commit_phase_time);
- tt_int_op(state->valid_after, ==, reveal_phase_time);
+ tt_int_op(state->valid_after, OP_EQ, reveal_phase_time);
/* Finally, let's go back in COMMIT phase so we can test the state update
* of a new protocol run. */
state->valid_after = 0;
sr_state_update(commit_phase_time);
- tt_int_op(state->valid_after, ==, commit_phase_time);
- tt_int_op(state->n_commit_rounds, ==, 1);
- tt_int_op(state->n_reveal_rounds, ==, 0);
- tt_u64_op(state->n_protocol_runs, ==, 1);
- tt_int_op(state->phase, ==, SR_PHASE_COMMIT);
- tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), ==, 1);
+ tt_int_op(state->valid_after, OP_EQ, commit_phase_time);
+ tt_int_op(state->n_commit_rounds, OP_EQ, 1);
+ tt_int_op(state->n_reveal_rounds, OP_EQ, 0);
+ tt_u64_op(state->n_protocol_runs, OP_EQ, 1);
+ tt_int_op(state->phase, OP_EQ, SR_PHASE_COMMIT);
+ tt_int_op(digestmap_size(state->commits), OP_EQ, 1);
tt_assert(state->current_srv);
done:
- sr_state_free();
+ sr_state_free_all();
UNMOCK(get_my_v3_authority_cert);
}
@@ -1284,7 +1381,11 @@ struct testcase_t sr_tests[] = {
NULL, NULL },
{ "encoding", test_encoding, TT_FORK,
NULL, NULL },
- { "get_next_valid_after_time", test_get_next_valid_after_time, TT_FORK,
+ { "get_start_time_of_current_run", test_get_start_time_of_current_run,
+ TT_FORK, NULL, NULL },
+ { "get_start_time_functions", test_get_start_time_functions,
+ TT_FORK, NULL, NULL },
+ { "get_sr_protocol_duration", test_get_sr_protocol_duration, TT_FORK,
NULL, NULL },
{ "get_state_valid_until_time", test_get_state_valid_until_time, TT_FORK,
NULL, NULL },