1 files changed, 0 insertions, 47 deletions
diff --git a/doc/spec/proposals/167-params-in-consensus.txt b/doc/spec/proposals/167-params-in-consensus.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index d23bc9c01e..0000000000
--- a/doc/spec/proposals/167-params-in-consensus.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
-Filename: 167-params-in-consensus.txt
-Title: Vote on network parameters in consensus
-Author: Roger Dingledine
-Created: 18-Aug-2009
-Status: Closed
-Implemented-In: 0.2.2
-
-0. History
-
-
-1. Overview
-
-  Several of our new performance plans involve guessing how to tune
-  clients and relays, yet we won't be able to learn whether we guessed
-  the right tuning parameters until many people have upgraded. Instead,
-  we should have directory authorities vote on the parameters, and teach
-  Tors to read the currently recommended values out of the consensus.
-
-2. Design
-
-  V3 votes should include a new "params" line after the known-flags
-  line. It contains key=value pairs, where value is an integer.
-
-  Consensus documents that are generated with a sufficiently new consensus
-  method (7?) then include a params line that includes every key listed
-  in any vote, and the median value for that key (in case of ties,
-  we use the median closer to zero).
-
-2.1. Planned keys.
-
-  The first planned parameter is "circwindow=101", which is the initial
-  circuit packaging window that clients and relays should use. Putting
-  it in the consensus will let us perform experiments with different
-  values once enough Tors have upgraded -- see proposal 168.
-
-  Later parameters might include a weighting for how much to favor quiet
-  circuits over loud circuits in our round-robin algorithm; a weighting
-  for how much to prioritize relays over clients if we use an incentive
-  scheme like the gold-star design; and what fraction of circuits we
-  should throw out from proposal 151.
-
-2.2. What about non-integers?
-
-  I'm not sure how we would do median on non-integer values. Further,
-  I don't have any non-integer values in mind yet. So I say we cross
-  that bridge when we get to it.
-