diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | changes/bug40471 | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | src/feature/dirauth/dirauth_options.inc | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | src/feature/dirauth/dirvote.c | 3 |
3 files changed, 9 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/changes/bug40471 b/changes/bug40471 new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..323e049599 --- /dev/null +++ b/changes/bug40471 @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ + o Minor bugfixes (dirauth, bandwidth scanner): + - Add the AuthDirDontVoteOnDirAuthBandwidth dirauth config parameter to + avoid voting on bandwidth scanner weights to v3 directory authorities. + Fixes bug 40471; bugfix on 0.2.2.1-alpha. Patch by Neel Chauhan. diff --git a/src/feature/dirauth/dirauth_options.inc b/src/feature/dirauth/dirauth_options.inc index 05726b8c2f..307ecbd286 100644 --- a/src/feature/dirauth/dirauth_options.inc +++ b/src/feature/dirauth/dirauth_options.inc @@ -109,4 +109,7 @@ CONF_VAR(VersioningAuthoritativeDirectory, BOOL, 0, "0") * pressure or not. */ CONF_VAR(AuthDirRejectRequestsUnderLoad, BOOL, 0, "1") +/** Boolean: Should we not give bandwidth weight measurements to dirauths? */ +CONF_VAR(AuthDirDontVoteOnDirAuthBandwidth, BOOL, 0, "1") + END_CONF_STRUCT(dirauth_options_t) diff --git a/src/feature/dirauth/dirvote.c b/src/feature/dirauth/dirvote.c index ffaa78b997..a00e0c0fb0 100644 --- a/src/feature/dirauth/dirvote.c +++ b/src/feature/dirauth/dirvote.c @@ -2265,7 +2265,8 @@ networkstatus_compute_consensus(smartlist_t *votes, smartlist_add_asprintf(chunks, "pr %s\n", chosen_protocol_list); } /* Now the weight line. */ - if (rs_out.has_bandwidth) { + if (rs_out.has_bandwidth && (!rs_out.is_authority || + !dirauth_get_options()->AuthDirDontVoteOnDirAuthBandwidth)) { char *guardfraction_str = NULL; int unmeasured = rs_out.bw_is_unmeasured; |