diff options
author | Nick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org> | 2016-11-29 11:47:12 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Nick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org> | 2016-12-16 11:06:19 -0500 |
commit | 84bfa895d725338d92f677a31a4dcf6381845e0c (patch) | |
tree | 048ac001141964a38514f0f061c32601cd46c251 /src/test/test_entrynodes.c | |
parent | 46619ec9143450b181a8510011d3e3fd92542aa4 (diff) | |
download | tor-84bfa895d725338d92f677a31a4dcf6381845e0c.tar.gz tor-84bfa895d725338d92f677a31a4dcf6381845e0c.zip |
Change return value of entry_guard_succeeded to an enum.
George pointed out that (-1,0,1) for (never usable, maybe usable
later, usable right now) was a pretty rotten convention that made
the code harder to read.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/test_entrynodes.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/test_entrynodes.c | 29 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/test_entrynodes.c b/src/test/test_entrynodes.c index 32af7ffd5d..6a3048b338 100644 --- a/src/test/test_entrynodes.c +++ b/src/test/test_entrynodes.c @@ -2324,6 +2324,7 @@ test_entry_guard_select_for_circuit_highlevel_primary(void *arg) const node_t *node = NULL; circuit_guard_state_t *guard = NULL; entry_guard_t *g; + guard_usable_t u; /* * Make sure that the pick-for-circuit API basically works. We'll get * a primary guard, so it'll be usable on completion. @@ -2343,8 +2344,8 @@ test_entry_guard_select_for_circuit_highlevel_primary(void *arg) /* Call that circuit successful. */ update_approx_time(start+15); - r = entry_guard_succeeded(&guard); - tt_int_op(r, OP_EQ, 1); /* We can use it now. */ + u = entry_guard_succeeded(&guard); + tt_int_op(u, OP_EQ, GUARD_USABLE_NOW); /* We can use it now. */ tt_assert(guard); tt_int_op(guard->state, OP_EQ, GUARD_CIRC_STATE_COMPLETE); g = entry_guard_handle_get(guard->guard); @@ -2411,8 +2412,8 @@ test_entry_guard_select_for_circuit_highlevel_primary(void *arg) /* Call this one up; watch it get confirmed. */ update_approx_time(start+90); - r = entry_guard_succeeded(&guard); - tt_int_op(r, OP_EQ, 1); /* We can use it now. */ + u = entry_guard_succeeded(&guard); + tt_int_op(u, OP_EQ, GUARD_USABLE_NOW); tt_assert(guard); tt_int_op(guard->state, OP_EQ, GUARD_CIRC_STATE_COMPLETE); g = entry_guard_handle_get(guard->guard); @@ -2440,6 +2441,7 @@ test_entry_guard_select_for_circuit_highlevel_confirm_other(void *arg) circuit_guard_state_t *guard = NULL; int i, r; const node_t *node = NULL; + guard_usable_t u; /* Declare that we're on the internet. */ entry_guards_note_internet_connectivity(gs); @@ -2471,13 +2473,13 @@ test_entry_guard_select_for_circuit_highlevel_confirm_other(void *arg) tt_int_op(g->is_pending, OP_EQ, 1); (void)start; - r = entry_guard_succeeded(&guard); + u = entry_guard_succeeded(&guard); /* We're on the internet (by fiat), so this guard will get called "confirmed" * and should immediately become primary. * XXXX prop271 -- I don't like that behavior, but it's what is specified */ tt_int_op(guard->state, OP_EQ, GUARD_CIRC_STATE_COMPLETE); - tt_assert(r == 1); + tt_assert(u == GUARD_USABLE_NOW); tt_int_op(g->confirmed_idx, OP_EQ, 0); tt_int_op(g->is_primary, OP_EQ, 1); tt_int_op(g->is_pending, OP_EQ, 0); @@ -2503,6 +2505,7 @@ test_entry_guard_select_for_circuit_highlevel_primary_retry(void *arg) int i, r; const node_t *node = NULL; entry_guard_t *g; + guard_usable_t u; /* Declare that we're on the internet. */ entry_guards_note_internet_connectivity(gs); @@ -2540,8 +2543,8 @@ test_entry_guard_select_for_circuit_highlevel_primary_retry(void *arg) update_approx_time(start + 3600); /* Say that guard has succeeded! */ - r = entry_guard_succeeded(&guard); - tt_int_op(r, OP_EQ, 0); // can't use it yet. + u = entry_guard_succeeded(&guard); + tt_int_op(u, OP_EQ, GUARD_MAYBE_USABLE_LATER); tt_int_op(guard->state, OP_EQ, GUARD_CIRC_STATE_WAITING_FOR_BETTER_GUARD); g = entry_guard_handle_get(guard->guard); @@ -2556,8 +2559,8 @@ test_entry_guard_select_for_circuit_highlevel_primary_retry(void *arg) r = entry_guard_pick_for_circuit(gs, &node, &guard2); tt_assert(r == 0); tt_int_op(guard2->state, OP_EQ, GUARD_CIRC_STATE_USABLE_ON_COMPLETION); - r = entry_guard_succeeded(&guard2); - tt_assert(r == 1); + u = entry_guard_succeeded(&guard2); + tt_assert(u == GUARD_USABLE_NOW); tt_int_op(guard2->state, OP_EQ, GUARD_CIRC_STATE_COMPLETE); tt_assert(! entry_guards_all_primary_guards_are_down(gs)); @@ -2689,18 +2692,18 @@ upgrade_circuits_setup(const struct testcase_t *testcase) tor_assert(data->guard2_state->state == GUARD_CIRC_STATE_USABLE_IF_NO_BETTER_GUARD); - int r; + guard_usable_t r; update_approx_time(data->start + 32); if (make_circ1_succeed) { r = entry_guard_succeeded(&data->guard1_state); - tor_assert(r == 0); + tor_assert(r == GUARD_MAYBE_USABLE_LATER); tor_assert(data->guard1_state->state == GUARD_CIRC_STATE_WAITING_FOR_BETTER_GUARD); } update_approx_time(data->start + 33); if (make_circ2_succeed) { r = entry_guard_succeeded(&data->guard2_state); - tor_assert(r == 0); + tor_assert(r == GUARD_MAYBE_USABLE_LATER); tor_assert(data->guard2_state->state == GUARD_CIRC_STATE_WAITING_FOR_BETTER_GUARD); } |