summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/or/circuituse.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>2011-07-07 10:40:23 -0400
committerNick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>2011-07-19 01:58:45 -0400
commit20c0581a7935369fecb6c62b7cf5c7c244cdb533 (patch)
tree6299dd43e16754ad285e9519eb040e99386ac2d1 /src/or/circuituse.c
parent773bfaf91ebe1ef80f37d473714a11f962e753fb (diff)
downloadtor-20c0581a7935369fecb6c62b7cf5c7c244cdb533.tar.gz
tor-20c0581a7935369fecb6c62b7cf5c7c244cdb533.zip
Launch sufficient circuits to satisfy pending isolated streams
Our old "do we need to launch a circuit for stream S" logic was, more or less, that if we had a pending circuit that could handle S, we didn't need to launch a new one. But now that we have streams isolated from one another, we need something stronger here: It's possible that some pending C can handle either S1 or S2, but not both. This patch reuses the existing isolation logic for a simple solution: when we decide during circuit launching that some pending C would satisfy stream S1, we "hypothetically" mark C as though S1 had been connected to it. Now if S2 is incompatible with S1, it won't be something that can attach to C, and so we'll launch a new stream. When the circuit becomes OPEN for the first time (with no streams attached to it), we reset the circuit's isolation status. I'm not too sure about this part: I wanted some way to be sure that, if all streams that would have used a circuit die before the circuit is done, the circuit can still get used. But I worry that this approach could also lead to us launching too many circuits. Careful thought needed here.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/or/circuituse.c')
-rw-r--r--src/or/circuituse.c13
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/src/or/circuituse.c b/src/or/circuituse.c
index 19a62344f3..93098e527d 100644
--- a/src/or/circuituse.c
+++ b/src/or/circuituse.c
@@ -1457,12 +1457,20 @@ circuit_get_open_circ_or_launch(edge_connection_t *conn,
rend_client_rendcirc_has_opened(circ);
}
}
- }
- if (!circ)
+ } /* endif (!circ) */
+ if (circ) {
+ /* Mark the circuit with the isolation fields for this connection.
+ * When the circuit arrives, we'll clear these flags: this is
+ * just some internal bookkeeping to make sure that we have
+ * launched enough circuits.
+ */
+ connection_edge_update_circuit_isolation(conn, circ, 0);
+ } else {
log_info(LD_APP,
"No safe circuit (purpose %d) ready for edge "
"connection; delaying.",
desired_circuit_purpose);
+ }
*circp = circ;
return 0;
}
@@ -1509,6 +1517,7 @@ link_apconn_to_circ(edge_connection_t *apconn, origin_circuit_t *circ,
apconn->cpath_layer = circ->cpath->prev;
}
+ circ->isolation_any_streams_attached = 1;
connection_edge_update_circuit_isolation(apconn, circ, 0);
}