| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
The `test_cleanup()` test for guiprocess was triggering the early timer
warning messages because it was using a VeryCourse timer with a 100ms
interval. Changed it to to a normal Course timer (the default) for that
test.
For the `ipc-timeout` timer we know that is happening in the tests on
windows. It's being logged in lost of e2e tests, the elapsed times it's
logging are between 0 and 0.020s. I'm not sure if it's the right thing
to be changing the log level in production code or marking the messages
as expected in test code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since we are now checking for early timer firings in usertype.Timer I
figured why do it in two places, lets call the check method on Timer in
the handler in the IPC class too.
I also removed the platform and version check because while the bug only
happens under those conditions the check to ensure a timer event was
valid should work everywhere. Right? We can add them back of someone
wants but I'm not sure I see a point.
It would be nice if we could filter out invalid timer events in
usertypes.Timer and not require the consuming code to have to do
anything. But that would be more work, so lets wait until more places of
code actually need to care about it, chances are it'll be fixed in Qt
soon enough anyway.
I also think usertypes.Timer should be restarting the time so it gets
called at the proper time. But if we aren't filtering the events that
would mean it gets called twice.
|
|
Since we added some sanity checking in usertypes.Timer() around
QTBUG-124496 it would be convenient if there was a reminder for future
timer users to use our Timer object instead. Here's one!
It's looking for QTimer initialisations, we are still allowing
QTimer.singleShot(), although that probably can hit the same issue.
It uses an end-of-line anchor in the regex so you can put a comment (any
comment) on the end of the line to ignore the check.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows seems to struggle with the dash
|
|
|
|
Easier fix instead of 6c4be8ef03bdcf09e86e14de02b8bd308e6e527b.
Seems to get picked up just fine, and shouldn't hurt when it's not needed, as we
don't use --pre. Thus, no development releases should be installed.
|
|
This reverts commit 6c4be8ef03bdcf09e86e14de02b8bd308e6e527b.
Possibly easier solution in next commit.
|
|
See https://www.riverbankcomputing.com/pipermail/pyqt/2024-April/045832.html and https://github.com/pypi/support/issues/3949
|
|
6.7 is released now, some distros are already shipping it!
This commit:
1. adds a new 6.7 requirements file (the plain 6 one has already been
updated by the bot)
2. adds a new tox env referring to the new requirements file
3. updates the mac and windows installer jobs to run with pyqt67 with the
assumption we'll be including that in our next release
4. adds two new CI environments for 6.7, one each for python 3.11 and 3.12
(3.12 only came out like 6 months ago)
5. updates a couple of references to the py37 tox env that looked like they
were missed, 3.7 support was dropped in 93c7fdd
6. updates various ubuntu containers to the latest LTS instead of the previous
related one - this is quite unrelated to this change but I thought I would
give it a go, no need to use the old one unless we are specifically testing
on it?
- linters - they use tox but probably use system libraries
- these all run in nested containers anyway, should be fully isolated
- codeql - eh, uses a third party action, check the docs if it fails
- irc - as above
|
|
mypy:
Mypy knows about the QDataStream.Status.SizeLimitExceeded attribute now,
so we can remove the ignore. But mypy for pyqt5 doesn't know about it,
so put the whole graceful block behind an additional conditional as well
to hide it from pyqt5 mypy.
cheroot:
looks like the format of the error message we are already ignoring
changed slightly. The `ssl/tls` bit changed to `sslv3`, at least in our
setup.
|
|
|
|
Update dependencies
|
|
|
|
Previously (a209c86c55a4) I've added a delay in browser code before sending
events to the page to account with a race condition where events weren't
processed after navigating. Then I had to add extra checks to tests that had
tight timing requirements.
That was for click-element, this commit reverts an attempt at the same
strategy for fake-key and instead adds wait statements in the tests that where
hitting the original race condition (sending events "too soon" after a
navigation).
The reason for the different approach here is that after adding the delay in
fake-key I had to add an extra "wait for log line" message to a few tests with
tight timing requirements to watch for a Tab key press. That worked great for
webengine but it made some tests start failing on webkit. We don't seem to get
that log message on webkit. I've got no-idea why and frankly think I've spent
way too much time on just a handful of tests already.
It's unfortunate we have to add manually delays in the e2e tests. It makes me
think if anyone else adds a test in the future with this combination of steps
(open page, run fake-key) they'll run into the same issue and it'll be hard to
spot. Oh well, we'll deal with that when it comes up.
The tests that where failing on webkit are the ones in caret.feature
touched in this commit.
Reverts included in this commit:
Revert "Delay fake-key events by 10ms"
This reverts commit 9f050c7460c42f317ceaa20b320e97d371a2c0a0.
Revert "Wait for evidence of Tab key press in tests before proceeding"
This reverts commit d47d247941c4b1fe3adac0dae8be301b36aec85b.
|
|
In the previous commit 9f050c7460c4 "Delay fake-key events by 10ms" I delayed
events for fake-key by 10ms to deal with a timing issue with sending events
right after a navigation not being processed.
Just like last time that's caused a few tests with tight timing constraints to
break because they proceed to the next command before the fake-key events have
taken effect.
Maybe it would have been better to just put the waits in the e2e tests in the
first case instead of in the production code? Well, we'll see. Maybe I'll
never have to deal with this again.
|
|
Similar to a209c86c55a4 "Delay QEvent driven mouse clicks by 10ms" it seems
that sending fake-key QEvents immediately after a navigation causes the events
to not be processed.
This is causing e2e tests in keyinput.feature to fail in a flaky, but
frequent, manner. This can also be resolved in some other ways like putting
a wait in the e2e tests like so:
When I open data/keyinput/log.html
And I wait 0.01s
And I run :fake-key <Escape>
But relying on maintainers to remember to do that seems error prone. If this
10ms delay turns out to be something to get rid of we could try keep this
delay to be used in less cases:
1. add some magic to e2e tests where it compares the previous and current line
and if it sees an open and a click-element or fake-key line next to each
other it delays for a bit
2. in the application code in tab.send_event() store the time of last
navigation and queue events for sending till after that
The affected tests in this case where:
tests/end2end/features/test_keyinput_bdd.py::test_fakekey_sending_key_to_the_website
tests/end2end/features/test_keyinput_bdd.py::test_fakekey_sending_special_key_to_the_website
tests/end2end/features/test_keyinput_bdd.py::test_fakekey_sending_keychain_to_the_website
|
|
Exit prompt mode on the last test in downloads.feature because it's
preventing the next tests in editor.feature from running. Screenshots of
the first failing test in editor.feature shows a prompt open and
jsprompt open in the background.
This shouldn't happen as there is a module level fixture in conftest.py
that is supposed to close and re-open the browser process between each
feature file. That bears more examination but for now this change looks
pretty painless.
|
|
I've added a 10ms delay when sending a fake click via QEvents to help with a
timing issue in the prompt e2e tests in Qt6.7. Apparently that throws off the
tight timing of this one test! I guess the `:scroll bottom` comes before the
iframe has been clicked.
I'm a little worried that if we are depending on timing stuff like this we
should be looking at a more thorough solution. Maybe the "and follow" suffix
can trigger it to wait for "Clicked *editable element!"?
Also I can try to reduce the delay in the click, but 10ms is pretty short
already.
|
|
On CI with Qt 6.7 we are seeing several tests failing in a flaky, but
frequent, manner. These tests all seem to be doing :click-element and
sending a "fake" click, as in one driven by QEvents, to a button on the
test page after opening the page in an existing tab. In the logs we see
that the element was identified with JS correctly but we don't see any
evidence of the actual click after that.
I've been testing locally with `python3 -m pytest
tests/end2end/features/test_prompts_bdd.py -k test_javascript_confirm`.
Delaying the click event by as little as 5ms seems to make the tests
consistently pass. I'm setting it to an arbitrary 10ms here for no good
reason. It's unfortunate that we have to change production code to make
tests pass, it's unlikely that a 10ms window will affect real usage, and
the problem is only immediately after a navigation. If we can't find a
better way to resolve this and want to get rid of the 10ms delay when no
needed we could maybe look at when the last navigation time for the tab
was to decide whether to delay or not.
I also tried changing all the "open in" lines in the failing tests to be
"open in new tab" and that seemed to make the flaky tests pass
consistently too. But relying on people writing tests in a specific way
wouldn't really be fixing the problem.
Additionally, running just one test at a time (with `taskset -c 1 ...`)
made all the tests pass consistently. So it seems like the root cause
could have something to do with that, somehow. Or maybe just running the
pytest process and the browser process on the same CPU causes enough of
a delay to not trigger it.
I don't know what the root cause of this change is, or if we can use a
more event based way of knowing when the page (or its focus proxy) is
ready to receive events. I've tried digging through events and debugging
webengine and haven't got anywhere, hopefully this delay is painless
enough that it'll do. To summarize, the page, or focus proxy, doesn't
process events (all events, just mouse events?) immediately after
navigating.
I initially tried delaying all events in `tab.send_event()`, but that
caused some caret tests to fail (the `selectionfollow_with_link_tabbing`
e2e ones), not sure why. So I walked back to just delaying click events.
I've seen some intermittent flakyness in
`test_misc_bdd.py::test_clicking_on_focused_element` and
`tests/end2end/features/test_keyinput_bdd.py::test_fakekey_sending_keychain_to_the_website`
which may indicate that `:fake-key` needs the same treatment. We'll see
how things stand once it's been stable on the main branch for a while
instead of being muddled up in this investigation branch.
I thought the issue might be that the RenderWidgetHostViewQt was being swapped out
on the new page load and the old one being sent the event. So I added a bunch
of debug logging to try to get a better view of that. None of this debug
logging is showing up when the tests fail so it seems that isn't the case.
The tests failing in the last four bleeding edge qt6 tests before these
changes were (test, count):
('tests/end2end/features/test_keyinput_bdd.py::test_fakekey_sending_special_key_to_the_website', 2),
('tests/end2end/features/test_prompts_bdd.py::test_using_contentjavascriptalert', 2),
('tests/end2end/features/test_editor_bdd.py::test_select_two_files_with_multiple_files_command', 2),
('tests/end2end/features/test_misc_bdd.py::test_clicking_first_element_matching_a_selector', 2),
('tests/end2end/features/test_misc_bdd.py::test_clicking_on_focused_element', 2),
('tests/end2end/features/test_prompts_bdd.py::test_javascript_prompt_with_default', 2),
('tests/end2end/features/test_prompts_bdd.py::test_using_contentjavascriptprompt', 2),
('tests/end2end/features/test_prompts_bdd.py::test_javascript_confirm__aborted', 2),
('tests/end2end/features/test_editor_bdd.py::test_file_selector_deleting_temporary_file', 1),
('tests/end2end/features/test_keyinput_bdd.py::test_fakekey_sending_keychain_to_the_website', 1),
('tests/end2end/features/test_prompts_bdd.py::test_javascript_confirm__no', 1),
('tests/end2end/features/test_prompts_bdd.py::test_javascript_confirm_with_default_value', 1),
('tests/end2end/test_insert_mode.py::test_insert_mode[100-input.html-qute-input-keypress-awesomequtebrowser]', 1),
('tests/end2end/features/test_misc_bdd.py::test_clicking_an_element_by_position', 1),
('tests/end2end/features/test_prompts_bdd.py::test_javascript_confirm__yes', 1),
('tests/end2end/features/test_prompts_bdd.py::test_javascript_confirm_with_invalid_value', 1),
('tests/end2end/test_insert_mode.py::test_insert_mode[125-input.html-qute-input-keypress-awesomequtebrowser]', 1),
('tests/end2end/features/test_editor_bdd.py::test_select_two_files_with_single_file_command', 1),
('tests/end2end/features/test_keyinput_bdd.py::test_fakekey_sending_key_to_the_website', 1),
('tests/end2end/features/test_misc_bdd.py::test_clicking_an_element_by_id_with_dot', 1),
('tests/end2end/features/test_prompts_bdd.py::test_javascript_alert_with_value', 1)
For debugging in GBD under test I ran the test process under GDB and
passed a script to GDB to print out a message, and then continue, when
it hit a breakpoint. Unfortunately, the tests always passed when run
under GDB.
For that I changed `_executable_args()` in quteprocess to return `"gdb",
"-q -x handleMouseEvent-breakpoint -args".split() + [executable] + args`
where `handleMouseEvent-breakpoint` is:
set breakpoint pending on
set debuginfod enabled off
break RenderWidgetHostViewQtDelegateClient::handleMouseEvent
commands
call (void) fprintf(stderr, "Entering handleMouseEvent\n")
continue
end
run
The tests were consistently passing, but erroring on the invalid gdb log lines.
|
|
qutebrowser/feat/7187_chromium_security_patch_in_version
Show chromium security patch version in :version
|
|
See https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-124386
Fixes #8143
|
|
Update dependencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
We've already ignored this in the tests, it started showing up in the
nightly builds a few days ago, only on macos for some reason.
|
|
Changed line 35 of tor_identity userscript to stop it throwing an err…
|
|
'--control-port' is passed
|
|
|
|
Default since flake8-pytest-style 2.0.0: https://github.com/m-burst/flake8-pytest-style#change-log
|
|
Default since 0.991: https://mypy-lang.blogspot.com/2022/11/mypy-0990-released.html
|
|
Update dependencies
|
|
This only shows up on the webkit CI job.
Probably something to do with the fact that we are using webkit builds
from the distant archives. I'm sure it'll break for real one of these
days.
|
|
It's a new externalised dependency of jaraco.context, doesn't seem to
have a RTD site yet.
ref: https://github.com/jaraco/jaraco.context/commit/e13fc7f2b379683c326153a3d6f4d2800f812fd0
|
|
flake8 got a new warning about a module name shadowing a builtin module: https://github.com/gforcada/flake8-builtins/pull/121
Probably would have been safe enough to ignore it. But I don't think
moving it is that hard anyway. Hopefully I didn't miss anything!
|
|
|
|
See https://github.com/qutebrowser/qutebrowser/issues/8159
|
|
A couple of tests seem to be failing because there is two windows open and
they don't expect it. I haven't fixed the root cause, I looked through the
logs and couldn't see why a second window was open. But if this makes the
tests pass, I guess we can address that if someone reports it.
Also changed `_get_scroll_values()` to handle multiple tabs/windows being open
too while I was there.
Example logs: https://github.com/qutebrowser/qutebrowser/actions/runs/8548730512/job/23422922448
Sessions file from the test logs:
Current session data:
windows:
- geometry: !!binary |
AdnQywADAAAAAAAyAAAAMgAAA1EAAAKJAAAAMgAAADIAAANRAAACiQAAAAAAAAAAAyAAAAAyAAAA
MgAAA1EAAAKJ
tabs:
- active: true
history:
- active: true
last_visited: '2024-04-04T03:21:00'
pinned: false
scroll-pos:
x: 0
y: 0
title: about:blank
url: about:blank
zoom: 1.0
- active: true
geometry: !!binary |
AdnQywADAAAAAAAyAAAAMgAAA1EAAAKJAAAAMgAAADIAAANRAAACiQAAAAAAAAAAAyAAAAAyAAAA
MgAAA1EAAAKJ
tabs:
- active: true
history:
- active: true
last_visited: '2024-04-04T03:21:03'
pinned: false
scroll-pos:
x: 0
y: 40
title: Scrolling
url: http://localhost:39235/data/scroll/simple.html
zoom: 1.0
|
|
In the bleeding edge CI tests I'm seeing:
IGNORED: Path override failed for key base::DIR_APP_DICTIONARIES and path '/__w/qutebrowser/qutebrowser/.tox/bleeding/lib/python3.11/sitePath override failed for key base::DIR_APP_DICTIONARIES and path '/__w/qutebrowser/qutebrowser/.tox/bleeding/lib/python3.11/site-packages/PyQt6/Qt6/libexec/qtwebengine_dictionaries'
INVALID: -packages/PyQt6/Qt6/libexec/qtwebengine_dictionaries'
Where the second line looks like maybe spill over from the first one
that is for some reason being printed twice and interleaved! Maybe
different processes or threads?
I did a regex for "line ending with this and with no spaces in it" which
is hopefully safe enough to not pick up a wrong line accidentally.
|
|
See https://www.reddit.com/r/qutebrowser/comments/1bomb3h/closing_popups_within_a_webpage_and_toggling/
|
