| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Rewrite a method expression such as 'T.String' (where T is type param
and String is part of its type bound Stringer) as:
func(rcvr T, other params...) {
return Stringer(rcvr).String(other params...)
}
New function buildClosure2 to create the needed closure. The conversion
Stringer(rcvr) uses the dictionary in the outer function.
For a method expression like 'Test[T].finish' (where finish is a method
of Test[T]), we can already deal with this in buildClosure(). We just
need fix transformDot() to allow the method lookup to fail, since shapes
have no methods on them. That's fine, since for any instantiated
receiver type, we always use the methods on the generic base type.
Also removed the OMETHEXPR case in the main switch of node(), which
isn't needed any (and removes one more potential unshapify).
Also, fixed two small bugs with handling closures that have generic
params or generic captured variables. Need to set the instInfo for the
closure in the subst struct when descending into a closure during
genericSubst() and was missing initializing the startItabConv and gfInfo
fields in the closure info.
Change-Id: I6dadedd1378477936a27c9c544c014cd2083cfb7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/338129
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
|
|
We don't usually reformat the test directory, but all of the files in
test/typeparam are syntactically valid. I suspect the misformattings
here are because developers aren't re-installing gofmt with
-tags=typeparams, not intentionally exercising non-standard
formatting.
Change-Id: I3767d480434c19225568f3c7d656dc8589197183
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/338093
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
|
|
In the case that a generic function/method f does a method call on a
type param allowed by its bound, an instantiation of f may do a direct
method call of a concrete type or a method call defined on a generic
type, depending on whether the passed type in a concrete type or an
instantiated type with the appropriate method defined. See the test case
boundmethod.go added to this change.
In order to keep the dictionary format the same for all instantiations
of a generic function/method, I decided to have an optional
sub-dictionary entry for "bounds" calls. At the point that we are
creating the actual dictionary, we can then fill in the needed
sub-dictionary, if the type arg is an instantiated type, or a zeroed
dictionary entry, if type arg is not instantiated and the method will be
on a concrete type.
In order to implement this, I now fill in n.Selection for "bounds"
method calls in generic functions as well. Also, I need to calculate
n.Selection correctly during import for the case where it is now set -
method calls on generic types, and bounds calls on typeparams.
With this change, the dictionaries/sub-dictionaries are correct for
absdiff.go. The new test boundmethod.go illustrates the case where the
bound sub-dict entry is not used for a dictionary for stringify[myint],
but is used for a dictionary for stringify[StringInt[myint]].
Change-Id: Ie2bcb971b7019a9f1da68c97eb03da2333327457
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/333456
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
|
