| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
is deleted
timerModifiedEarliest contains the lowest possible expiration for a
modified earlier timer, which may be earlier than timer0When because we
haven't yet updated the heap. Note "may", as the modified earlier timer
that set timerModifiedEarliest may have since been modified later or
deleted.
We can clear timerModifiedEarliest when the last timer is deleted
because by definition there must not be any modified earlier timers.
Why does this matter? checkTimersNoP claims that there is work to do if
timerModifiedEarliest has passed, causing findRunnable to loop back
around to checkTimers. But the code to clean up timerModifiedEarliest in
checkTimers (i.e., the call to adjusttimers) is conditional behind a
check that len(pp.timers) > 0.
Without clearing timerModifiedEarliest, a spinning M that would
otherwise go to sleep will busy loop in findRunnable until some other
work is available.
Note that changing the condition on the call to adjusttimers would also
be a valid fix. I took this approach because it feels a bit cleaner to
clean up timerModifiedEarliest as soon as it is known to be irrelevant.
For #51654.
Fixes #53846.
Change-Id: I3f3787c67781cac7ce87939c5706cef8db927dd5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/417434
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit c006b7ac2765252f397dec40fef610a3c17d956d)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/417476
|
|
When the adjustTimers function removed a timer it assumed it was
sufficient to continue the heap traversal at that position.
However, in some cases a timer will be moved to an earlier
position in the heap. If that timer is timerModifiedEarlier,
that can leave timerModifiedEarliest not correctly representing
the earlier such timer.
Fix the problem by restarting the heap traversal at the earliest
changed position.
For #47762
Fixes #47859
Change-Id: I152bbe62793ee40a680baf49967bcb89b1f94764
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/343882
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2da3375e9b4980e368a8641f54cc53c4af4d1a12)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/350001
|
|
In CL 336432 we changed adjusttimers so that it no longer cleared
timerModifiedEarliest if there were no timersModifiedEarlier timers.
This caused some Google internal tests to time out, presumably due
to the increased contention on timersLock. We can avoid that by
simply not skipping the loop in adjusttimers, which lets us safely
clear timerModifiedEarliest. And if we don't skip the loop, then there
isn't much reason to keep the count of timerModifiedEarlier timers at all.
So remove it.
The effect will be that for programs that create some timerModifiedEarlier
timers and then remove them all, the program will do an occasional
additional loop over all the timers. And, programs that have some
timerModifiedEarlier timers will always loop over all the timers,
without the quicker exit when they have all been seen. But the loops
should not occur all that often, due to timerModifiedEarliest.
For #47329
Change-Id: I7b244c1244d97b169a3c7fbc8f8a8b115731ddee
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/337309
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
This avoids a race when a new timerModifiedEarlier timer is created by
a different goroutine.
Fixes #47329
Change-Id: I6f6c87b4a9b5491b201c725c10bc98e23e0ed9d1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/336432
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
The timerpMask optimization updates a mask of Ps (potentially)
containing timers in pidleget / pidleput. For correctness, it depends on
the assumption that new timers can only be added to a P's own heap.
addtimer violates this assumption if it is preempted after computing pp.
That G may then run on a different P, but adding a timer to the original
P's heap.
Avoid this by disabling preemption while pp is in use.
Other uses of doaddtimer should be OK:
* moveTimers: always moves to the current P's heap
* modtimer, cleantimers, addAdjustedTimers, runtimer: does not add net
new timers to the heap while locked
Fixes #44868
Change-Id: I4a5d080865e854931d0a3a09a51ca36879101d72
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/300610
Trust: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Before this CL, the following sequence was possible:
* GC scavenger starts and sets up scavenge.timer
* GC calls readyForScavenger, but sysmon is sleeping
* program calls runtime.GOMAXPROCS to shrink number of processors
* procresize destroys a P, the one that scavenge.timer is on
* (*pp).destroy calls moveTimers, which gets to the scavenger timer
* scavenger timer is timerWaiting, and moveTimers clears t.pp
* sysmon wakes up and calls wakeScavenger
* wakeScavengers calls stopTimer on scavenger.timer, still timerWaiting
* stopTimer calls deltimer which loads t.pp, which is still nil
* stopTimer tries to increment deletedTimers on nil t.pp, and crashes
The point of vulnerability is the time that t.pp is set to nil by
moveTimers and the time that t.pp is set to non-nil by moveTimers,
which is a few instructions at most. So it's not likely and in
particular is quite unlikely on x86. But with a more relaxed memory
model the area of vulnerability can be somewhat larger. This appears
to tbe the cause of two builder failures in a few months on linux-mips.
This CL fixes the problem by making moveTimers change the status from
timerWaiting to timerMoving while t.pp is clear. That will cause
deltimer to wait until the status is back to timerWaiting, at which
point t.pp has been set again.
Fixes #43712
Change-Id: I66838319ecfbf15be66c1fac88d9bd40e2295852
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/284775
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
timer.when must always be positive. addtimer and modtimer already check
that it is non-negative; we expand it to include zero. Also upgrade from
pinning bad values to throwing, as these values shouldn't be possible to
pass (except as below).
timeSleep may overflow timer.nextwhen. This would previously have been
pinned by resetForSleep, now we fix it manually.
runOneTimer may overflow timer.when when adding timer.period. Detect
this and pin to maxWhen.
addtimer is now too strict to allow TestOverflowRuntimeTimer to test an
overflowed timer. Such a timer should not be possible; to help guard
against accidental inclusion siftup / siftdown will check timers as it
goes. This has been replaced with tests for period and sleep overflows.
Change-Id: I17f9739e27ebcb20d87945c635050316fb8e9226
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/274853
Trust: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
timer when == 0, in the context of timer0When and timerModifiedEarliest,
is a sentinel value meaning there are no timers on the heap.
TestCheckRuntimeTimerOverflow reaching into the runtime to set a timer
to when = 0 when it is otherwise not possible breaks this invariant.
After golang.org/cl/258303, we will no longer detect and run this timer,
thus blocking any other timers lower on the heap from running. This
manifests as random timers failing to fire in other tests.
The need to set this overflowed timer to when = 0 is gone with the old
timer proc implementation, so we can simply remove it.
Fixes #42424
Change-Id: Iea32100136ad8ec1bedfa77b1e7d9ed868812838
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/274632
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
Also use the simplified nobarrierWakeTime in findrunnable, as it no
longer needs the current time.
Change-Id: I77b125d6a184dde0aeb517fc068164c274f0a046
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/266304
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
Some programs have a lot of timers that they adjust both forward and
backward in time. This can cause a large number of timerModifiedEarlier
timers. In practice these timers are used for I/O deadlines and are
rarely reached. The effect is that the runtime spends a lot of time
in adjusttimers making sure that there are no timerModifiedEarlier
timers, but the effort is wasted because none of the adjusted timers
are near the top of the timer heap anyhow.
Avoid much of this extra work by keeping track of the earliest known
timerModifiedEarlier timer. This lets us skip adjusttimers if we know
that none of the timers will be ready to run anyhow. We will still
eventually run it, when we reach the deadline of the earliest known
timerModifiedEarlier, although in practice that timer has likely
been removed. When we do run adjusttimers, we will reset all of the
timerModifiedEarlier timers, and clear our notion of when we need
to run adjusttimers again.
This effect should be to significantly reduce the number of times we
walk through the timer list in adjusttimers.
Fixes #41699
Change-Id: I38eb2be611fb34e3017bb33d0a9ed40d75fb414f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/258303
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Trust: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I97d0d1343d41b603a68388e496411fb040dc6d66
GitHub-Last-Rev: d11177ad249bd844dd9e7e355eea28596d0b1fa8
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#38625
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/229767
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
|
|
Previously we stopped the timer and then reset it. With the current
timer implementation that is no longer required.
Change-Id: Ie7aba61ad53ce835f6fcd0b6bce7fe0a15b10e24
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/227180
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
Currently if a goroutine is preempted while owning a timer in the
timerModifying state, it could self-deadlock. When the goroutine is
preempted and calls into the scheduler, it could call checkTimers. If
checkTimers encounters the timerModifying timer and calls runtimer on
it, then runtimer will spin, waiting for that timer to leave the
timerModifying state, which it never will.
So far we got lucky that for the most part that there were no preemption
points while timerModifying is happening, however CL 221077 seems to
have introduced one, leading to sporadic self-deadlocks.
This change disables preemption explicitly while a goroutines holds a
timer in timerModifying. Since only checkTimers (and thus runtimer) is
called from the scheduler, this is sufficient to prevent
preemption-based self-deadlocks.
Fixes #38070.
Updates #37894.
Change-Id: Idbfac310889c92773023733ff7e2ff87e9896f0c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/225497
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Reduce the length of time that other timer functions can see timerModifying.
In particular avoid system calls.
Fixes #38023
Change-Id: I1b61229c668e6085d9ee6dca9488a90055386c36
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/224902
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
The cleantimers can run for a while in some unlikely cases.
If the GC is trying to preempt the G, it is forced to wait as the
G is holding timersLock. To avoid introducing a GC delay,
return from cleantimers if the G has a preemption request.
Fixes #37779
Change-Id: Id9a567f991e26668e2292eefc39e2edc56efa4e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/223122
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
|
|
If we see a racy use of timers, as in concurrent calls to Timer.Reset,
do the operations in an unpredictable order, rather than crashing.
Fixes #37400
Change-Id: Idbac295df2dfd551b6d762909d5040fc532c1b34
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/221077
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
This CL implements Ticker.Reset method in time package.
Benchmark:
name time/op
TickerReset-12 6.41µs ±10%
TickerResetNaive-12 95.7µs ±12%
Fixes #33184
Change-Id: I4cbd31796efa012b2a297bb342158f11a4a31fef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220424
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
This reverts CL 217362 (6e5652bebede2d53484a872f6d1dfeb498b0b50c.)
Reason for revert: Causing failures on arm64 bots. See #33184 for more info
Change-Id: I72ba40047e4138767d95aaa68842893c3508c52f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220638
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
This CL implements Ticker.Reset method in time package.
Benchmark:
name time/op
TickerReset-12 6.41µs ±10%
TickerResetNaive-12 95.7µs ±12%
Fixes #33184
Change-Id: I12c651f81e452541bcbbc748b45f038aae1f8dae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/217362
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I5f4c21bf650b9825ebd98330ac9faa7371a562be
GitHub-Last-Rev: 4a2e9aabe91935001300619b6f58c67f05e9f3c7
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#36728
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216223
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
The timers code used to have a problem: if code started and stopped a
lot of timers, as would happen with, for example, lots of calls to
context.WithTimeout, then it would steadily use memory holding timers
that had stopped but not been removed from the timer heap.
That problem was fixed by CL 214299, which would remove all deleted
timers whenever they got to be more than 1/4 of the total number of
timers on the heap.
The timers code had a different problem: if there were some idle P's,
the running P's would have lock contention trying to steal their timers.
That problem was fixed by CL 214185, which only acquired the timer lock
if the next timer was ready to run or there were some timers to adjust.
Unfortunately, CL 214185 partially undid 214299, in that we could now
accumulate an increasing number of deleted timers while there were no
timers ready to run. This CL restores the 214299 behavior, by checking
whether there are lots of deleted timers without acquiring the lock.
This is a performance issue to consider for the 1.14 release.
Change-Id: I13c980efdcc2a46eb84882750c39e3f7c5b2e7c3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/215722
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
This reduces lock contention when only a few P's are running and
checking for whether they need to run timers on the sleeping P's.
Without this change the running P's would get lock contention
while looking at the sleeping P's timers. With this change a single
atomic load suffices to determine whether there are any ready timers.
Change-Id: Ie843782bd56df49867a01ecf19c47498ec827452
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/214185
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
|
|
Whenever more than 1/4 of the timers on a P's heap are deleted,
remove them from the heap.
Change-Id: Iff63ed3d04e6f33ffc5c834f77f645c52c007e52
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/214299
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
When adjustTimers sees a timerModifiedEarlier or timerModifiedLater,
it removes it from the heap, leaving a new timer at that position
in the heap. We were accidentally skipping that new timer in our loop.
In some unlikely cases this could cause adjustTimers to look at more
timers than necessary.
Change-Id: Ic71e54c175ab7d86a7fa46f1497aca71ed1c43cc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/214338
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
We were using the race context of the P that held the timer,
but since we unlock the P's timers while executing a timer
that could lead to a race on the race context itself.
Updates #6239
Updates #27707
Fixes #35906
Change-Id: I5f9d5f52d8e28dffb88c3327301071b16ed1a913
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/209580
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
Updates #6239
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I65e6471829c9de4677d3ac78ef6cd7aa0a1fc4cb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171884
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
|
|
Dan Scales pointed out a theoretical deadlock in the runtime.
The timer code runs timer functions while holding the timers lock for a P.
The scavenger queues up a timer function that calls wakeScavenger,
which acquires the scavenger lock.
The scavengeSleep function acquires the scavenger lock,
then calls resetTimer which can call addInitializedTimer
which acquires the timers lock for the current P.
So there is a potential deadlock, in that the scavenger lock and
the timers lock for some P may both be acquired in different order.
It's not clear to me whether this deadlock can ever actually occur.
Issue 35532 describes another possible deadlock.
The pollSetDeadline function acquires pd.lock for some poll descriptor,
and in some cases calls resettimer which can in some cases acquire
the timers lock for the current P.
The timer code runs timer functions while holding the timers lock for a P.
The timer function for poll descriptors winds up in netpolldeadlineimpl
which acquires pd.lock.
So again there is a potential deadlock, in that the pd lock for some
poll descriptor and the timers lock for some P may both be acquired in
different order. I think this can happen if we change the deadline
for a network connection exactly as the former deadline expires.
Looking at the code, I don't see any reason why we have to hold
the timers lock while running a timer function.
This CL implements that change.
Updates #6239
Updates #27707
Fixes #35532
Change-Id: I17792f5a0120e01ea07cf1b2de8434d5c10704dd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/207348
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
In the discussion of CL 171828 we decided that it was not necessary to
acquire timersLock around the call to moveTimers, because the world is
stopped. However, that is not correct, as sysmon runs even when the world
is stopped, and it calls timeSleepUntil which looks through the timers.
timeSleepUntil acquires timersLock, but that doesn't help if moveTimers
is running at the same time.
Updates #6239
Updates #27707
Updates #35462
Change-Id: I346c5bde594c4aff9955ae430b37c2b6fc71567f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/206938
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
Otherwise, we can get into a deadlock: sysmon takes the scheduler lock
and calls timeSleepUntil which takes each P's timer lock. Simultaneously,
some P calls runtimer (holding the P's own timer lock) which wakes up
the scavenger, calling goready, calling wakep, calling startm, getting
the scheduler lock. Now the sysmon thread is holding the scheduler lock
and trying to get a P's timer lock, while some other thread running on
that P is holding the P's timer lock and trying to get the scheduler lock.
So change sysmon to call timeSleepUntil without holding the scheduler
lock, and change timeSleepUntil to use allpLock, which is only held for
limited periods of time and should never compete with timer locks.
This hopefully
Fixes #35375
At least it should fix the linux-arm64-packet builder problems,
which occurred more reliably as that system has GOMAXPROCS == 96,
giving a lot more scope for this deadlock.
Change-Id: I7a7917daf7a4882e0b27ca416e4f6300cfaaa774
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/205558
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
Before this CL adjustTimers left timers being moved in an inconsistent
state: status timerWaiting but not on a P. Simplify the code by
leaving the timers in timerMoving status until they are actually moved.
Other functions (deltimer, modtimer) will wait until the move is complete
before changing anything on the timer. This does leave timers in timerMoving
state for longer, but still not all that long.
Fixes #35367
Change-Id: I31851002fb4053bd6914139125b4c82a68bf6fb2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/205418
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
When dropping a P, if it has any timers, and if some thread is
sleeping in the netpoller, wake the netpoller to run the P's timers.
This mitigates races between the netpoller deciding how long to sleep
and a new timer being added.
In sysmon, if all P's are idle, check the timers to decide how long to sleep.
This avoids oversleeping if no thread is using the netpoller.
This can happen in particular if some threads use runtime.LockOSThread,
as those threads do not block in the netpoller.
Also, print the number of timers per P for GODEBUG=scheddetail=1.
Before this CL, TestLockedDeadlock2 would fail about 1% of the time.
With this CL, I ran it 150,000 times with no failures.
Updates #6239
Updates #27707
Fixes #35274
Fixes #35288
Change-Id: I7e5193e6c885e567f0b1ee023664aa3e2902fcd1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204800
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
If multiple goroutines call time.(*Timer).Reset then the timer will go
from timerWaiting to timerDeleted to timerModifying to timerModifiedLater.
The timer can be on a different P, meaning that simultaneously cleantimers
could change it from timerDeleted to timerRemoving to timerRemoved.
If Reset sees timerRemoved, it was doing an atomic.Store of timerWaiting,
meaning that it did not necessarily see the other values set in the timer,
so the timer could appear to be in an inconsistent state. Use atomic.Cas
to avoid that possibility.
Updates #6239
Updates #27707
Fixes #35272
Change-Id: I1d59a13dc4f2ff4af110fc6e032c8c9d59cfc270
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204717
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
The addAdjustedTimers function was a late addition, and it got some of
the state machine wrong, leading to failures like
https://storage.googleapis.com/go-build-log/930576b6/windows-amd64-2016_53d0319e.log
Updates #6239
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I9e94e563b4698ff3035ce609055ca292b9cab3df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204280
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
No big changes in the runtime package benchmarks.
Changes in the time package benchmarks:
name old time/op new time/op delta
AfterFunc-12 1.57ms ± 1% 0.07ms ± 1% -95.42% (p=0.000 n=10+8)
After-12 1.63ms ± 3% 0.11ms ± 1% -93.54% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Stop-12 78.3µs ± 3% 73.6µs ± 3% -6.01% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
SimultaneousAfterFunc-12 138µs ± 1% 111µs ± 1% -19.57% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
StartStop-12 28.7µs ± 1% 31.5µs ± 5% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+7)
Reset-12 6.78µs ± 1% 4.24µs ± 7% -37.45% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Sleep-12 183µs ± 1% 125µs ± 1% -31.67% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Ticker-12 5.40ms ± 2% 0.03ms ± 1% -99.43% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Sub-12 114ns ± 1% 113ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.069 n=9+10)
Now-12 37.2ns ± 1% 36.8ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.287 n=8+8)
NowUnixNano-12 38.1ns ± 2% 37.4ns ± 3% -1.87% (p=0.020 n=10+9)
Format-12 252ns ± 2% 195ns ± 3% -22.61% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
FormatNow-12 234ns ± 1% 177ns ± 2% -24.34% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
MarshalJSON-12 320ns ± 2% 250ns ± 0% -21.94% (p=0.000 n=8+8)
MarshalText-12 320ns ± 2% 245ns ± 2% -23.30% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Parse-12 206ns ± 2% 208ns ± 4% ~ (p=0.084 n=10+10)
ParseDuration-12 89.1ns ± 1% 86.6ns ± 3% -2.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Hour-12 4.43ns ± 2% 4.46ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.324 n=10+8)
Second-12 4.47ns ± 1% 4.40ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.145 n=9+10)
Year-12 14.6ns ± 1% 14.7ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.112 n=9+9)
Day-12 20.1ns ± 3% 20.2ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.404 n=10+9)
Updates #6239
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I51e25a90f941574f1a9cf83a22e84ac8c678537d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171883
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
|
|
Since the new timers run on g0, which does not have a race context,
we add a race context field to the P, and use that for timer functions.
This works since all timer functions are in the standard library.
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I8a5b727b4ddc8ca6fc60eb6d6f5e9819245e395b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171882
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
|
|
Updates #27707
Change-Id: Id4b37594511895f404ee3c09a85263b2b35f835d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171881
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
|
|
Since timers are now on a P, rather than having a G running timerproc,
timejump changes to return a P rather than a G.
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I3d05af2d664409a0fd906e709fdecbbcbe00b9a7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171880
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I51da8a04ec12ba1efa435e86e3a15d4d13c96c45
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171879
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I1e65effb708911c727d126c51e0f50fe219f42ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171878
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
The adjusttimers function is where we check the adjustTimers field in
the P struct to see if we need to resort the heap. We walk forward in
the heap and find and resort timers that have been modified, until we
find all the timers that were modified to run earlier. Along the way
we remove deleted timers.
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I1cba7fe77b8112b7e9a9dba80b5dfb08fcc7c568
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171877
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
Updates #27707
Change-Id: Idda31d0065064a81c570e291ef588d020871997d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171836
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
Also add a skeleton of the runOneTimer function.
Updates #27707
Change-Id: Ic6a0279354a57295f823093704b7e152ce5d769d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171835
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
The dodeltimer function removes a timer from a heap. The dodeltimer0
function removes the first timer from a heap; in the old timer code
this common special case was inlined in the timerproc function.
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I1b7c0af46866abb4bffa8aa4d8e7143f9ae8f402
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171834
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
|
|
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I02f97ec7869ec8a3fb2dfc94cff246badc7ea0fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171833
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
This adds a new field to P, adjustTimers, that tells the P that one of
its existing timers was modified to be earlier, and that it therefore
needs to resort them.
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I4c5f5b51ed116f1d898d3f87cdddfa1b552337f8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171832
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I720e8af9e183c75abcb63ccc30466734c8dba74f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171831
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
When we add a timer, make sure that the network poller is initialized,
since we will use it if we have to wait for the timer to be ready.
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I0637fe646bade2cc5ce50b745712292aa9c445b1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171830
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
Add new fields to runtime.timer, and adjust the various timer
functions in preparation for adding timers to P's. This continues to
use the old timer code.
Updates #6239
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I9adb3814f657e083ec5e22736c4b5b52b77b6a3f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171829
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
Updates #6239
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I52cab8bf3dc8c552463725fc1d9e4e6b12230b03
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171828
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
Add support to the main scheduler loop for handling timers on P's.
This is not used yet, as timers are not yet put on P's.
Updates #6239
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I6a359df408629f333a9232142ce19e8be8496dae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171826
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
