| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The general policy for the current state of js/wasm is that it only
has to support tests that are also supported by nacl.
The test nilptr3.go makes assumptions about which nil checks can be
removed. Since WebAssembly does not signal on reading a null pointer,
all nil checks have to be explicit.
Updates #18892
Change-Id: I06a687860b8d22ae26b1c391499c0f5183e4c485
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/110096
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
TestParallelRWMutexReaders has a non-preemptible loop in it that can
deadlock if GC triggers. "Fix" it like we've fixed similar tests.
Updates #10958.
Change-Id: I13618f522f5ef0c864e7171ad2f655edececacd7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/73710
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Currently only the rwmutex write lock prevents descheduling. The read
lock does not. This leads to the following situation:
1. A reader acquires the lock and gets descheduled.
2. GOMAXPROCS writers attempt to acquire the lock (or at least one
writer does, followed by readers). This blocks all of the Ps.
3. There is no 3. The descheduled reader never gets to run again
because there are no Ps, so it never releases the lock and the system
deadlocks.
Fix this by preventing descheduling while holding the read lock. This
requires also rewriting TestParallelRWMutexReaders to always create
enough GOMAXPROCS and to use non-blocking operations for
synchronization.
Fixes #20903.
Change-Id: Ibd460663a7e5a555be5490e13b2eaaa295fac39f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47632
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Currently runtime.rwmutex is written to block the calling goroutine
rather than the calling thread. However, rwmutex was intended to be
used in the scheduler, which means it needs to be a thread-level
synchronization primitive.
Hence, this modifies rwmutex to synchronize threads instead of
goroutines. This has the consequence of making it write-barrier-free,
which is also important for using it in the scheduler.
The implementation makes three changes: it replaces the "w" semaphore
with a mutex, since this was all it was being used for anyway; it
replaces "writerSem" with a single pending M that parks on its note;
and it replaces "readerSem" with a list of Ms that park on their notes
plus a pass count that together emulate a counting semaphore. I
model-checked the safety and liveness of this implementation through
>1 billion schedules.
For #20738.
Change-Id: I3cf5a18c266a96a3f38165083812803510217787
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47071
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
This is a runtime version of sync.RWMutex that can be used by code in
the runtime package. The type is not quite the same, in that the zero
value is not valid.
For future use by CL 43713.
Updates #19546
Change-Id: I431eb3688add16ce1274dab97285f555b72735bf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45991
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
|
