aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/cmd/compile/internal/types2/stmt.go
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/cmd/compile/internal/types2/stmt.go')
-rw-r--r--src/cmd/compile/internal/types2/stmt.go6
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/src/cmd/compile/internal/types2/stmt.go b/src/cmd/compile/internal/types2/stmt.go
index 7865c2d4f4..8cfdf92e67 100644
--- a/src/cmd/compile/internal/types2/stmt.go
+++ b/src/cmd/compile/internal/types2/stmt.go
@@ -52,11 +52,6 @@ func (check *Checker) funcBody(decl *declInfo, name string, sig *Signature, body
check.error(body.Rbrace, "missing return")
}
- // TODO(gri) Should we make it an error to declare generic functions
- // where the type parameters are not used?
- // 12/19/2018: Probably not - it can make sense to have an API with
- // all functions uniformly sharing the same type parameters.
-
// spec: "Implementation restriction: A compiler may make it illegal to
// declare a variable inside a function body if the variable is never used."
check.usage(sig.scope)
@@ -422,7 +417,6 @@ func (check *Checker) stmt(ctxt stmtContext, s syntax.Stmt) {
check.assignVar(lhs[0], &x)
case *syntax.CallStmt:
- // TODO(gri) get rid of this conversion to string
kind := "go"
if s.Tok == syntax.Defer {
kind = "defer"