From 1755a4122b6ee80624f0f5b4333dba0343e4fcc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Mathewson Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:26:39 -0400 Subject: Turn off proposals 131 and 211. 131 is obsolete for being incredibly old, and not being how we'd actually like torcheck to work any more. It comes from a pre-tbb world. 211 is on reserve since nobody's asked for it in a while, and sensible folk are maintaining torcheck now. --- proposals/proposal-status.txt | 24 ++---------------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) (limited to 'proposals/proposal-status.txt') diff --git a/proposals/proposal-status.txt b/proposals/proposal-status.txt index 31fc11f..7cc77fa 100644 --- a/proposals/proposal-status.txt +++ b/proposals/proposal-status.txt @@ -54,16 +54,6 @@ again to remind me! **NOTE**: The dates after each paragraph indicate when I last revised the paragraph. -131 Help users to verify they are using Tor [NEEDS-REVISION] - - This one is not a crazy idea, but I marked it as - needs-revision since it doesn't seem to work so well with - our current designs. It seems mostly superseded by proposal - 211. (11/2013) - - I say, mark it as OBSOLETE and make a note on proposal 211 to see it for - historical information. (9/2015) - 132 A Tor Web Service For Verifying Correct Browser Configuration This proposal was meant to give users a way to see if their @@ -418,18 +408,6 @@ again to remind me! This needs an update; it's a pretty good idea, and Mike and Roger like it. It goes will with FallbackDirSource stuff. (9/2015) -211 Internal Mapaddress for Tor Configuration Testing - - Here, the idea is to serve an XML document over HTTP that - would let the know when it's using Tor. The XML document - would be returned when you make a request over Tor for a - magic address in 127.0.0.0/8. I think we need to do - _something_to solve this problem, but I'm not thrilled with - the idea of having any more magical addresses like this; we - got rid of .noconnect for a reason, after all. (11/2013) - - Mark as REJECTED. (9/2015) - 212 Increase Acceptable Consensus Age This proposal suggests that we increase the maximum age of a @@ -674,4 +652,6 @@ TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AT THESE: Since last time: + Proposal 127 has been marked as obsolete. + Proposals 242-252 are new. -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf