From 13bd8dd35c887487033f2b17831c9adc0e0cbf86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roger Dingledine Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:33:21 -0500 Subject: cleanup proposals as i read them --- proposals/175-automatic-node-promotion.txt | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'proposals/175-automatic-node-promotion.txt') diff --git a/proposals/175-automatic-node-promotion.txt b/proposals/175-automatic-node-promotion.txt index c990b3f..f97cec0 100644 --- a/proposals/175-automatic-node-promotion.txt +++ b/proposals/175-automatic-node-promotion.txt @@ -175,6 +175,8 @@ Status: Draft might as well be a new one with no history. This policy may change once we start allowing the bridge authority to hand out new IP addresses given the fingerprint. + [Perhaps another consensus param? Also, this means we save previous + IP address in our state file, yes? -RD] 3.x Bandwidth measurement @@ -222,7 +224,7 @@ Status: Draft * Publication of IP address * Blocking from IRC (even for non-exit relays) - - What feedback should we give to bridge relays, to encourage then + - What feedback should we give to bridge relays, to encourage them e.g. number of recent users (what about reserve bridges)? - Can clients back-off from doing these tests (yes, we should do -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf