From b6402034dd79299390fe68f5c9ad79828f2d8ab1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Mathewson Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:58:38 +0000 Subject: r16926@tombo: nickm | 2008-07-11 15:58:34 -0400 fix spelling error spotted by qbi. svn:r15846 --- proposals/150-exclude-exit-nodes.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'proposals/150-exclude-exit-nodes.txt') diff --git a/proposals/150-exclude-exit-nodes.txt b/proposals/150-exclude-exit-nodes.txt index 10f972f..3d2b138 100644 --- a/proposals/150-exclude-exit-nodes.txt +++ b/proposals/150-exclude-exit-nodes.txt @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Security implications: Risks: - Use of this option can make users partitionable under certain attak + Use of this option can make users partitionable under certain attack assumptions. However, ExitNodes already creates this possibility, so there isn't much increased risk in ExcludeExitNods. -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf