From 2901a68f09c9b99b9f2c4c06eaed77605a01e2d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Jackson Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 18:35:25 +0000 Subject: State that "Congestion Control Request" appears in ENCRYPTED I got the answer to this question from proposals/324-rtt-congestion-control.txt (This thing should have a proper identifier, not merely a descriptive phrase, but that may be controversial.) --- spec/rend-spec/introduction-protocol.md | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/spec/rend-spec/introduction-protocol.md b/spec/rend-spec/introduction-protocol.md index 9b9c5b0..edc9112 100644 --- a/spec/rend-spec/introduction-protocol.md +++ b/spec/rend-spec/introduction-protocol.md @@ -494,6 +494,8 @@ ntorv3, if the service did not list "2" in the `FlowCtrl` line in the descriptor. The client SHOULD NOT provide this field if the consensus parameter 'cc_alg' is 0. +This appears in the ENCRYPTED section of the INTRODUCE1/INTRODUCE2 message. + #### Proof-of-Work (PoW) {#INTRO1_POW_EXT} This extension can be used to optionally attach a proof of work to the introduction request. -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf